Translate This Page
The original Wiki-leaks, best described as 'Wiccan-leaked' as this illustrates the Hidden nature of the State.
Welcome to my website! If you haven't been following my case "against the UK State", please read the latest up-date below to get a general idea. If you get really into it, you could get a much better idea of what it's all about if you read from the bottom of this page upwards, as that seems to be the way this website is laid out.
However, I have written an update, including a short synopsis below, dated 18th December 2014.
There's also background information on this website, all about 'Bhaji on the Beach and Barings Bank Crash of 1995'. This may be of interest to anyone concerned about topical subjects such as the NSA/GCHQ surveillance and the 2008 banksters' fiasco. I have alleged that since my marriage, around the early 90's, I was placed under surveillance by the State and by certain individuals in institutions linked to the British media and the Police. I have used a film made by Channel 4 in 1993, as evidence of this and this is further described on Barings Bank Page, linked below.
First written 17th December 2014; Edited 31st December 2014
An Institutional Assault: The Secret Shame of the British System
At the very least, this case, as described by my own personal experiences, explains clearly how the UK System and it's institutions including schools, Children's social services, the NHS, the State (government and intelligence), and the Police (details about my case against Northamptonshire Police was recently removed for legal reasons- still awaiting a trial date three years later) can organise to create a fake situation which allows criminalisation and the removal of children from their families. This case could be considered a microcosm example of what has happened (and continues to happen) to societies over the ages, including to indigenous populations that were "civilised" by invaders and continue to be oppressed in a similar manner to what is described in this personal case. This is perhaps the very reason the "British System" or "State", as I refer to it, became an empire and continues to influence the Western world.
This first hand information based on personal evidence garnered over two decades, includes anecdotal and written evidence, and I share it with you both to educate, to warn and make those who listen aware that once one individual's human rights are flagrantly violated in this manner, the pretence of any democracy is just that- a pretence.
Not only that, but there grows a real possibility that that one individual is just the test case for others, who are then also inflicted with the same violations of their human rights. It starts softly until many have cause to complain, until the State feels all-powerful, becomes oppressive and is finally branded "fascist" or a Police state.
My case in a nut-shell...
I am medical doctor and GP and live in the UK. I have given more information on my back-ground on this website (link is under my photo above). I am classed as a "British Asian" and was born in England my family having arrived from India two generations earlier. I graduated from Edinburgh medical school 21 years ago and married a Nigerian man. I have alleged on this website, that since getting married I have been subjected to State surveillance, as has my husband. This surveillance has not been passive but has been designed to disrupt our lives, personal and professional to a degree that should cause psychological injury.
During the course of my medical training, I worked in Psychiatry in hospitals across the UK, particularly in and around the nation's capital.
Give up your liberties, give up your money because TERRORISTS! pic.twitter.com/CtyDjbsZIi
— Aaron Makepeace (@azz169) November 29, 2014
This type of occult (hidden) surveillance has been conducted by the State in an orchestrated way, so that any institutions, such as the Police, are aware of it and are aware of the individuals on whom it has been inflicted upon. Unfortunately, we are not an isolated case, and such techniques have been used on many others, who often end up in a psychiatric institution- perhaps the desired outcome, or in a prison.
Gitmo Bay prisoner, pictured below.
Concerning my personal case, in 2011, this (illegal) surveillance culminated in a set of events initiated by Northamptonshire Police, where I then worked and lived. This was basically a bungled attempt at entrapment. As this was "bungled", the Policewoman in question (who will be in the dock soon- once the Court decides to give a trial date- I have been waiting a few months for this date to materialise), decided to instead, adversely affect my employment as a medical doctor by making false accusations in connection with the bungled entrapment.
This an internet enquiry made by my husband, Mr Adekola, one that we allege was being monitored by Northamptonshire police without our knowledge- yetanother illegal act the police continue to vehemently deny.
The NHS, whom I did not work for and was NOT contractually bound by, then used these accusations as leverage to further affect my employment as a GP.
Just two years earlier the same NHS had become unusually involved with my family, and in particular my young children. I have written more about this below- in 2012- and wrote this just before the Child Sex Abuse Ring revelations came to light- particularly those concerning the BBC and Savile. Since then, and over the last two years, thanks to leaks and investigative journalism, much of it citizens' journalism, the evidenced connections to government, State intelligence and an Elite Paedophile Ring have further come to light. In addition, there have been more revelations concerning the role of the Police in these child sex rings as well as social services and even State schools.
Returning to my case...
I was prevented from working as a GP in the UK by the NHS even though the professional body for
medical doctors, (the General Medical Council; the GMC), conducted an investigation over two years
(2011 to 2013) and concluded that I had no case to answer and could now work again in the UK without
restrictions. In contrast, an NHS Tribunal simultaneously ruled that I still could not work as a GP in the
NHS, although this still allowed me to work in private practice and outside the UK.
In effect, I was black-listed from working as a GP in the NHS in the UK,without just cause and without my
knowledge or representations. Clearly, it does not make sense to say that a doctor should not treat
patients within one institution, the NHS but is free to treat patients outside this framework whilst working in
the same nation state. Stranger still that I am allowed to work as a medical doctor in NHS hospitals but
not in my chosen speciality of General Practise.
Not allowed to appeal for two years from 2012 to 2014...
So, despite a hearing being held hastily in a court unknown to me, held without the NHS accusers even being present at the hearing, I was prevented from working as a GP for two years in 2012.
The date of this hearing was coincidentally a few days before a GMC hearing, that had cleared me of any "ill-health", namely being accused of being "paranoid". Therefore, I was declared not to be a patient risk- that is- I was "fit to practise", because the accusations made by the NHS, about being paranoid, did not stand up to scrutiny.
Link below: About psychological pressures on doctors under GMC investigation, causing suicides.
There is more information about this below, namely the contrast between the decisions made by the so-called 'NHS Tribunal' compared to those made by the professional body for medical doctors, the GMC.
I have also described below how the NHS attempted to use the label "paranoid" as an occult gagging order.
Unfortunately, this is quite often the case, when many oppressive regimes, use psychological techniques on
anyone they consider a "dissident"- basically anyone who reveals the truth and intent behind the actions of
the State or government figures and opposes these actions.
A sign of the times...? Also described in Terminator 2 movie, screen snapshot below:
The role of Hollywood and the British theatre mob, is also described on this website (on page titled, "Institutional Assault".
Anyway, as the two years of this NHS black-listing elapsed at the beginning of the year, I was given the opportunity to appeal the decision (no lawyer available on legal aid, apparently so I represented my self), but have since been informed that the black-listing is to continue- supposedly on an indefinite basis. The Judge (in the recent black-list appeal earlier this year, 2014) has said that the information given on this website shows I am "paranoid" thereby rendering me allegedly unsuitable to work in the NHS.
There have never been any issues regarding "patient safety", nor clinical competence as a medical doctor nor has there ever been any evidence of this. In fact the NHS itself admitted that there was no evidence of this. The Judge did not cite this as an issue either- odd because that was what should have been commented on as this was the function of this so-called NHS Tribunal.
The fact that this punitive action appears to be a direct result of the information given on this personal (not professional) website is very telling- in a country that supposedly champions democracy and constantly gives an international image of being on a higher moral ground compared to others, with respect to Human Rights.
As I said, even when initially opposed with much scepticism, this really is a case against the British State, in many ways than one, and the fact this website has created this tension, such that I should not be allowed to work in the UK, earn a living, support my family in a profession that is of some general use to the community, is a travesty.
A nationwide ban on working as a medical doctor, generally reasoned on the creation of this website, cannot be justified. As a result of the black list instated in 2012 I have been unable to work as a GP since then so this website bears no relation to any current professional medical issues, to any patients' cases or professional information relating to current colleagues, but leaves my right to work as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, violated.
Much of the information on this website relates to my personal life, my marriage (1993), Barings Bank crash (1995) and the making of a Channel 4 film, 'Bhaji on the Beach' in 1993. Link below:
It is inexplicable why the NHS should feel so vexed by this personal information which they state was extremelywrong to be published in the "public domain"- so much so that it has justified a nationwide NHS ban.
This website also describes valid and current issues such as bullying and racism in the NHS and many other issues that are politically motivated.
It is also rather notable that the NHS Tribunal took no offence to The Sunday Telegraph article (link below) that smeared me and my family and where the source of the information could only have been the sameNHS or the Police.
More on my version of this article main-stream media on this page below- most of the article was wrong or inaccurate and the information given was obviously deliberately intended to be damaging during the GMC investigative process in 2012.
Of course I will be appealing through all the UK Courts and hope to take this case to the European Court for Human Rights, if necessary.....I'll keep you posted.
In short, this case has revealed a witch-hunt; a vendetta, by persons unknown to me but who appear to have access to information about me and my family, else have garnered such information by illegal means, such as by surveillance.
The surveillance I describe has not been 'passive', but active and appears designed to be damaging to the targeted individual, who becomes a victim of a hidden and occult system of bullying. This system is organised within the institutions, such as the Police, the judiciary (where I have now reached), the NHS (including doctors), the prisons service, social (including children's) services, local councils, state schools and within the mainstream media. On a global scale it could be described as a network. The bullying is a form of psychological torture and those involved in it have knowledge of how to instigate it.
More on this on the 'Institutional Assault' page, link below:
Up-dated 27th August 2014
Feedback from recent readers of this website:
"This is a horrendous orchestrated attack"
"I read the entire site- wow!"
"I applaud your indefatigability- you are blessed. Respect."
More comments are at the top of the 'Opinion' page. I have had much
support on social media, and will keep you posted on the case and even
the trial dates if you are interested enough sit to voluntarily sit in a court!
Updated: 8th May 2014
"Details have been Removed...for Legal reasons": The posts below were recently edited 'for legal reasons'.I was informed that a claim against the Police has to be within 3 years of the event in question. Lo and behold, exactly 3 years later my legal team finally submitted the case to the Court for consideration. This was after a two years wait on my part. Anyway, it has been 'requested' that I should suspend this website so as not to give the opposing team any advantage. Plus the Police in question might decide to counter-sue me- though they haven't exercised this option in the last two years. In the meantime, I have agreed to edit it as there are "Freedom of Speech" side issues that make me reluctant to suspend or delete my site whilst awaiting the outcome of a case that make take many more months and may never even go to trial at all. In the meantime, there are many Internet users, particularly from social media sites, who have found the information I have posted helpful and interesting. The Police witness statement, photos and any reference to the officers involved, has been removed as this is now legal evidence.
For example, there are also unrelated parts of this website, such as that pertaining to the "My Background" page, that give an account of the Barings Bank Crash in 1995 and the 1993 film, 'Bhaji on the Beach'; the latter I have alleged relates to my life in 1992-1993, but was made without my knowledge or consent and in my view is a pointer to illegal surveillance. The Barings Bank Crash has links to Royalty, Jules Verne's 'prophecy and to my husband who was working in the City of London offices, at the time of the crash.
This website was set up in mid-May 2012 and in response to a defamatory UK newspaper article about me and my family and that cast negative aspersions on my character, personal and professional.
In May 2012 I also joined twitter. The initial reason was to publicise my philosophical case against the various institutions of the UK State via this website. I say philosophical rather than legal because I never felt the System would willingly make my claims public via a Court room type scenario. For example, in November 2013, my Employment Tribunal case against the NHS (the Secretary of State for Health, Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt, was one of the respondents I was claiming against) was rejected from going to a full hearing, one that would have been in the public domain, on a technicality- one that was patently unfair. This was after an equally unjust process by the doctors regulatory council that continued for two years (from June 2011 to June 2013) without an outcome. There are posts below that details this GMC (General Medical Council) investigation. The particular philosophy I follow is the TRUTH and using it to expose those who wrongly and falsely accuse others.
Your feedback on this website has been positive and is always welcome readers, so thanks for all your support. That's all for now folks!!
As this article then appeared as the top most find on Internet search engines on entering my name, I felt the only way for me to make an equally public riposte was by way of entering the true information on a personal blog. I felt my case also highlighted the injustices of the System, in particular in relation to Human Rights.
Northamptonshire NHS Primary Care Trust's involvement:
The statement above does not cover the separate activities of individuals at the Public Health 'Directorate' in Northampton NHS PCT. This department was initially based in Kettering before moving to the city of Northampton. During the time this case has been ongoing since 2011, the NHS department in questions and all the local ones throughout the UK, were abolished in 2013 by "NHS England". This dissolution was recently used as a reason to prevent my case against the PCT and my ex-employer from going ahead (an act that would have made it public), decided by a Judge at an Employment Tribunal held in November 2013.
I have written about its activities, which also constitute a malfeasance of NHS funds and powers below. What is startling is the fact that as a GP in what is essentially a private practice, I was not employed by the NHS and held no contract with it. Furthermore, I had never met the individuals involved, who
during the incident with the Police in March 2011 and the ensuing activities of the Employer, appeared to launch a personal vendetta against me and my family. This included NHS doctors in high positions working in collusion with both the Police and local social services: Dr Christine Hopton, Professor Stephen Horsely, Dr Frank Voeten and administrator Ms Sue Field. [FOR LEGAL REASONS THE FULL NAMES OF THESE INDIVIDUALS WAS REMOVED IN MAY 2014].
These individuals whom I was not employed by or with, colluded with colleagues at the medical surgery, Brackley Health Centre, including doctors and ancillary staff.
Around the same time, 2011-2012, I was also "black-listed" by the NHS (the UK's monolopy on health care services) from working as a GP/medical doctor two years ago in a 'papers only' trial that was held without my knowledge or representation. I was later informed that I could not appeal for two years. This case is ongoing and I'll keep you posted as I have requested a public hearing.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Updated: November 8th 2013
The Employment Tribunal Preliminary Hearing:
I will be attending a hearing regarding a case against my ex-employer and the local NHS PCT soon. The latter has since said it "doesn't exist" because it changed its name, so the Respondent is now the "Secretary of State for Health".
The hearing will be held in private, presumably at the request of the Respondents.
(Please also see below the Sunday Telegraph in an untruthful and defamatory article about me and my family). Very little is actually true and neither was I "struck off", as the dramatic and sensational headline implies:
Updated: 6th February 2014
The Case Against the UK Police: I have been trying to bring a legal case against the UK Police for the last two years, since 2012 and following an incident in 2011 when the Police entered my home.
Therefore, I have made my witness statement publicly available, below; this also as a reaction to the negative article published in the Sunday Telegraph newspaper. Please press button below to see the infamous article: [Edited- no longer available as case is awaiting trial]
The Witness Statement:
Claimant: Dr Rapinder Kaur Adekola
-v-
Defendant:
Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police
WITNESS STATEMENT OF DR RAPINDER K. ADEKOLA
I, Dr Rapinder K. Adekola of XXXXX, Edinburgh, Scotland will say as follows:
THIS WAS REMOVED FOR LEGAL REASONS IN MAY 2014. PLEASE SEE POSTING ABOVE, DATED 8TH MAY 2014.
Photo of my husband, Mr O. James Adekola and me below, taken in 1990's:
My writings on my experiences living in the UK State, stretch back 20 years. More on this website:
I've written about the film made by Channel 4 in 1993, that appeared to have taken my life and that of my then, new husband (pictured above), including private conversations in my home, and used this as the basis of their screen-play! This sounds far-fetched but appears to be the relative norm for institutions such as the BBC and their programming, and the Theatre mob. Other examples are covered on this website and includes Channel 4's Big Brother programming. Please read more on the Opinion page:
However, this also illustrates that the type of surveillance, now on a wide scale, was actually being inflicted on me illegally by the UK State more than 20 years ago...and still is. I live with the "comfort" that now a lot of people are subjected to GCHQ type intrusion, known in the U.S. as the NSA.
Regarding my writings of the last few years, including on this website, I have called this surveillance in conjunction with the outcome being oppression and punishment,
"An Institutional Assault: The Occult Secrets of the British System".
It is these secrets that constitute and uphold the present World Order.
This refers in particular to the attempts to artificially criminalise me and my husband (even though we were both educated professionals- I am a medical doctor and GP and more importantly, have not transgressed the Law of the country in any way), and ultimately proceed to label us as unfit to care for our own children.
Please also see Opinion page about Crypto-fascism and criminalization by occult or hidden means.
A campaign of harassment from the institutions around us, including the Police, our Employers, the NHS, social services and even landlords, led me to conclude that the individuals involved, who sought to continue their harassment even when we as a family, had left the UK for Australia, were involved in something far more sinister- a Paedophile Ring- one that routinely sought to remove children from their parents by the set-up of faked circumstances. This was alleged by me just before before the 2012 BBC Savile scandal and the hypothesised Elite Paedophile Ring surfaced. [Many Internet people have since provided evidence to clearly demonstrate that this is no longer a mere hypothesis:
Two years later I am still in a legal battle with the parties involved but have finally received a date for a preliminary hearing- to be held...in private.
Evidence being gathered for the hearing, including crucial information from local authorities/institutions, has been largely redacted in contravention of the Freedom of Information Act- even whole pages of text.
If the case proceeds to a full hearing, it should be held in public, in the interests of Equity and Justice.
I'll keep you posted if the case proceeds further.
Updated: Wednesday 18th September 2013
'Stool switching' and artificial criminalisation in a medical practice:
Whilst working as a medical doctor in a surgery, I believe I was a victim of ' stool switching'. In order to facilitate this and to criminalise, the Ministry of Justice's Probation service moved into adjacent surgery rooms- this in violation of established guidelines- where criminals were being interviewed side by side with patients. This was no done by accident but was a deliberate act of establishing themselves at my place of work in order to destabilise my life-style. This was done in connivance with doctors and other staff who worked at this medical practice.
This is a bit like the party game, 'musical chairs', except when the music stops you end up in a criminal's chair and your better chair (eg a professional, a doctor) has been taken by a Police-man!
Such occult activities are most effective on an unsuspecting victim who is helpless to defend himself. This is 'Crypto-fascism' is as described already on the Opinion page.
Updated: Monday 16th September 2013
Cancellation of twitter@RoadrunnerA:
(Edit: This twitter account was reactivated on Sunday 29th September 2013 but the problems with Cyber-bulling and trolling remain valid)
Due to continued harassment and bullying from an "anonymous twitter mob" I have decided to say 'bye, bye' and 'beep! beep!' to twitter.
This was after several weeks of intimidation via insults, that were oddly personalised. I refused to lock my account on the basis that twitter is meant to be a public forum and a mob should not decide who should or should not lock their accounts from everyone else bar their followers. I also thought that as I was gaining more followers and publicising my case more widely, this was upsetting certain quarters within the British Establishment.
Closing my account to anyone bar my followers (1800+) did not necessarily prevent Cyber-bullying, as I had also found that some followers accounts had been hacked into, on one occasion sending a tweet saying: "A penis or a knife, you choose". This was clearly not written by the account holder, whom I had held conversations with on several occasions.
A twitter fight/debate a few weeks ago resulted in a mob of tweeps (those who send tweets on that social networking forum called twitter- for those of you still living without such essential things), none of whom I followed, insulting and abusing me for my views. I received over 400 tweet replies in just 2 days. Many were gratuitous insults from people who clearly knew nothing about the subject being discussed. One group of people then searched onto the Internet to discredit my qualifications by using the article written by 'The Sunday Telegraph' newspaper (read all about it below) to further rubbish my opinions.
STALKING is defined as, "unwanted or obsessive attention by an individual or group towards another person. Stalking behaviour includes following the victim in person or monitoring them". Monitoring includes internet surveillance and if such a course of conduct amounts to harassment it is a criminal act.
This quickly turned into a critique of my website and every reason to call me "mentally ill", was used. All this because of my views on Darwinian evolution! I thought this was rather odd but after some research it was clear that this type of mob behaviour was routine- to bully anyone who criticised Darwin.
I was informed by the mob that I was in need of 'psychiatric care' and it was also implied that I should not be working as a medical doctor.
I would really have to question the health and mentality of a group of People who work together to anonymously harass another person they don't know and have never met. I would similarly question their minds:
Its easy for mob members to think that if everyone around them is engaging in the same activity, this somehow makes their actions acceptable.
I also question whether this action and bizarre over-reaction on twitter, was in relation to my own case regarding my ex-employer's actions and those of a local NHS PCT (Primary Care Trust) in its contribution to prevent me from practising
as a medical doctor and GP in the UK.
Even once I stopped expressing any views on Evolution the anonymous insults and abuse continued. I noted that most of those involved were from the UK and had 'Atheist' clearly stated in their bios- this even when I was talking about other subjects, not just Evolution. Just before quitting twitter, I talking about alternative historical views on Ancient Egypt. The anonymous mob of non-followers descended again- almost all were male. This time to make more detailed psychological assessments of my so-called, "trash can brain".
These people were the types who believe fully in the power of the State and it's occult abilities. These people feel they have a right to try and control the minds of others and to act as 'Handlers' (Mind programmers) or 'Instructors'.
They call themselves 'driving instructors' and the handled victim the 'learner driver'. The car, or 'ka', in this context, refers to the soul or the astral body and ka is the word for this in Ancient Egyptian. (Please google KA for more info.)
More on this subject, to follow on the Opinion page, shortly.
In the current age, you'd have to be brain-dead not to want to look for alternative view-points on any subject, with this amazing encyclopaedia at our finger-tips.
A very interesting perspective on religion below, a You-tube video on Ancient Egyptian mythology.
(Note: This film was not made by me, nor is it necessarily, endorsed by me):
I was informed by one mobster that the mob were able to make such psychiatric assessments based on my "behaviour and attitude" as, he said, demonstrated in my tweets. Again, these were exactly the same baseless and very personalised comments I had similarly received from people I didn't even know and had never met in the NHS but who had somehow managed to fabricate a legal case against me.
Considering there are 5 million active twitter users, some of whom say the strangest things, picking on one person for apparently no reason seemed very odd- even to me and I've come across some of the strangest things, believe you me!
However, even with my qualifications in Medicine and experience in Psychiatry, I wouldn't dream of thinking twitter was a forum for making psychological assessments or of diagnosing anyone.
I certainly couldn't imagine tweeting a non-follower repeatedly with a psychiatric diagnosis.
(Also see below how an NHS lawyer suggested a diagnosis of "Paranoid Personality Disorder' would aid their case against me as a medical doctor, particularly as I had made allegations of 'Illegal Surveillance' against the Police and medical practice where I had been working. I am in the process of suing both parties).
In addition, anyone who followed me on twitter would know that my tweets were hardly ever of a personal or personalised nature, but about news, current politics or other topics such as Science and History. Any information about my personal life was limited to links to this website. Hence, there was no need for personalised insults about non-personal matters.
The mobsters latterly denied ever having seen this website, but gave the reason for their insults and unusual attention to my account, as- I made "claims without evidence" and intimated that insults were deserved for making such claims. However, any claims in this case, were not my own but articles given on the Internet by others. The only personal claims I have made, are about illegal surveillance by the UK State, and they have been made on this site, not on twitter, and evidence for this has also been provided, to some extent on this site but mostly in private legal files.
The main-stream on-line bloggers ('shills', in particular) would like to think that the term, 'conspiracy theorist' should be used in a derogatory fashion and that it applies to anyone who has views that differ from that given in mainstream news or text-books, on any subject.
This is a way of censoring the Internet- via mob intimidation. I was also told that a doctor who doesn't believe in Evolution should not be a doctor- hence even my livelihood was publicly questioned by the Mob.
If you've read a little about my case (also below), you'll know I am in the process of suing the UK Police. The legal case, in true British legal system fashion is being delayed and delayed, "by any means necessary"; this includes the giving of inadequate representation.
Please see below for more information on how my medical insurance was (allegedly) fraudulently removed and would have covered me for £10 million of legal fees as well as giving me specialist legal representation by the Medical Defence Union, the MDU.
In addition I am taking my previous employer and the NHS to an Employment Tribunal.
I do think that all this has a bearing on the social media harassment I mention. For example, after joining 'Linked-in' for a short time last year, the first interest I received was from a Police-woman who was now working for NHS Northamptonshire- the same local NHS department I am in dispute with. Coincidentally, this personal event occurred at the same time there was a UK scandal about Linked-in passwords and hacking into of accounts.
The insistence on sending me tweets laden with abuse, especially concerning my apparently psychotic mental state, was also the crux of my case against the NHS. After making the allegation of illegal Police surveillance at my home, including of the Internet, I was told I had "Paranoid Personality", in 2011. (This was 2 years before the NSA/GCHQ scandal unfolded). This diagnosis was dismissed by qualified specialists, as the diagnosis itself was thrust upon me by an NHS lawyer, not a doctor! The diagnosis I have called the "gagging diagnosis".
This case recently (June 2013) fell through after an unnecessarily protracted and meaningless investigation. Now that its my opportunity to seek Justice for this, I am again being diagnosed with mental illness, again by strangers who have never met me but this time whilst socialising on an Internet forum. Their only defence is to claim 'insanity', but not on their part...on mine!?!
Side-track: The "mercury" policeman pictured below, as featured in the film, Terminator-Judgement Day, who can also "take over" any person, that is can transfer his soul into the body of the hijacked person by ejecting the inherent soul:
I alleged on twitter, that this Mob was likely to be UK Media types/Police or both and that they were the same kind of Group who would happily hack into a teenagers mobile telephone, before and/or after allegedly being involved in a 'Ring murder'.
(Please see Opinion page for more on 'Mind Programming, Astral Projection and Occult Dream-State assault and rape').
One such mobster subtly admitted he worked for the UK Media, as I had suspected.
The twitter abusers went onto to tell me that to believe the Institutions were 'against me', illustrated a "persecutory complex", but at the same time claiming they knew nothing of my case against the State and giving the impression that they hadn't read this website. These comments continued to repeatedly give the same conclusive advice- "I should seek psychiatric help immediately".
All this from anonymous individuals I did not know, but spoke 'as if' they knew me, and on several occasions as a direct result of having read this website with all its allegations which include an 'Institutional Assault' by a Mob that (allegedly) comprises of a Paedophile Ring.
Please see below- these allegations were made on this website just before the UK Scandal came to light, in mid-2012.
A common trick is for those conducting surveillance to further punish their victims by subtly making them aware of their surveillance. For example, whilst speaking to you (or tweeting you), to use key 'stand-out' words that the victim had used in his/her house, during a conversation.
Media-types do this kind of thing routinely. Rebekah Brooks, pictured above of the News of the World scandal and a former friend and employee of Rupert Murdoch, was known to have done this very thing to a Conservative MP; to intimate to him that she had private details of his life, that he was under surveillance. This was apparently at a public function that included other high ranking politicians.
This is all based on rumour and conjecture but is does illustrate the power of the UK media- even above that of it's government.
Updated: 21st June 2013
A Synopsis of the reason for this website:
By popular demand from those coming from twitter who have read the part about the film (allegedly made about me and my husband in 1993) and are confused about 'what happened next'...please read this summary!
If you've just read the bit about the film, 'Bhaji on the Beach' on the My Background page and have noted the role of the 1995 'Barings Bank' and my husband's work in the City of London (financial district), then the story gets "weirder" and more shocking:
Since then, 1993, we have been subject to illegal surveillance (at home and work and anywhere we go, including the local supermarket) and treatment akin to occult (hidden) and secret psychological torture in an attempt to use our minds for control. There is more about such Mind Control techniques on the
Opinion page. [MAY 2014: SOME DETAILS HAVE BEEN REMOVED BELOW FOR LEGAL REASONS]
The events concerning me and my family, of the last two years, is why I have taken the action of speaking on this website. These events culminated in the negative and false portrayal of me and my family in the British Press in May 2012. If you scroll down near the bottom of this page to the 27th October 2012 posting, you'll see how this defamatory material disseminated to 4 continents around the world, specifically to anywhere I might want to live and/or work or where I may have ancestral family connections.
In 2011, I accused Northamptonshire of a 'set-up' during which I was wrongly arrested and falsely imprisoned, but no charge was made.
Once no charges were brought (as I had done nothing wrong), the NHS (National Health Service) and my employer in a medical practice where I worked as a GP (General Practitioner), then made false complaints and claims in order to make a case to the GMC (UK doctors' professional regulatory body) to prevent me from working. This went on for 2 years until recently when the GMC dropped the case. The GMC wasted two years to complete an "investigation" and during the last year brought no additional evidence even though it took me to Court to extend the time for an investigation just a few months ago. The Police took one day to complete the same investigation after which time they brought no charge.
However, the NHS ignoring my Human Rights to Work and to practise as a doctor in the UK, continue to black-list me from working within in it's organisation as a GP and continue to ignore the decision made by the GMC-the body which regulates doctors.
After I accused the Police of procedural irregularity in 2011, the NHS and my previous employer, labelled me as having 'Paranoid Personality Disorder'. This was without my having been examined by anyone, let alone a doctor or a specialist (a psychiatrist). I was then told that I would have to be examined by two GMC psychiatrists otherwise I could face being "struck off" the doctors' register and prevented from working.
I therefore complied with this examination in view of the absurd notion I was mentally unwell, and the labels of being PARANOID was dismissed by both specialists. I've given more details on this below.
In the meantime, the NHS used public funds to send a Private Investigator who specialised in "tracking" to look for us- this after I had resigned and left the UK to live and work Australia. The local school stated that my children were "missing", after I informed them that we had left the local area and that my kids no longer required a school place. The NHS have been unable answer why they used NHS public funds to harass me and my family and it was after I spoke about this and provided the GMC with evidence.
Last year, before the BBC Paedophile scandal, I alleged that the UK were conducting a secret and Institutional Assault against my family and that such individuals, I alleged were members of an occult paedo. ring.
Read more below...if you're really interested, it might be easier to start from the bottom of the page and work your way up. .
Comments to @RoadrunnerA but if you would like to stay in touch, please do email me: rapinder.adekola@gmail.com
If you're still interested there will be more posts on this website on a variety of topics, so keep an eye open for for the Up-dates list on the Home page.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated: 21st August 2013
My case to the Employment Tribunal:
Here are details from my application to sue my previous employer, a GP practice and the NHS:
Industrial_Tribunal_form_14thJuly2013.pdf Size : 4686.797 Kb Type : pdf |
|
Translate This Page
Updated: 6th June 2013
More about the false label of "Paranoid Personality Disorder".This was in response to a letter in defence of fake and spurious allegations regarding my conduct as a GP and doctor, and my further allegations of bullying and insidious harassment from my employers. I was put in the position of having
to see 2 psychiatrists who dismissed this diagnosis as false. This is akin to Stasi tactics where dissidents were labelled as crazy.
Please see posts below, 23rd and 4th November 2012.
I have also written on the Opinion page about how David Icke was interviewed in the 1991 by the BBC after making accusations against the BBC, and was made to appear crazy and paranoid as well as suffering reputation damage and being publicly humiliated:
Mr Icke was a popular professional footballer before he became a Sports presenter for the BBC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated: 1st June 2013
If you have been following my case, the most recent events described below,but more also described about my background on the other pages of this website; an 'occult' and often not so hidden persecution of me and my family spanning back almost two decades, and you are interested in it, please don't
hesitate to get in touch.
If you are able and in a position to consider my case from the perspective of offering me and my family political asylum from the UK State, I would be most interested in your views.
How does an individual seek Political Asylum from the New World Order, an organisation that operates in secret (eg Bilderberg group) yet successfully globally oppresses many?
Up-dated: Wednesday 15th May 2013
Human Rights in the UK: The Right to Earn a Living
For those who've been following the case against me, to prevent me working a as a doctor, with all its twists and turns, there's even more to say about the odd and sometimes sinister way this case has been dealt with by the UK "authorities". For those of you new to it; welcome! and I hope you will read some of the earlier posts below.
Latest is that, although the professional regulatory body for doctors in the UK, (the GMC, stands for General Medical Council) has reviewed the information given to it, information I have alleged contains malicious lies) and decided I am allowed to work as a doctor in the UK, having made this decision last year, the NHS, the Health Service, which employs most doctors, the private sector in the UK being only a small part of the health service, have black-listed me from the whole of the United Kingdom and from working in any medical practice!
[Parts of this article were removed in May 2014 for Legal reasons.]
Up-dated: Sunday 5th May 2013
Police Corruption in a Police State:
Across the Continents from the UK to the US:
The news today about an African-American male being mauled and arrested by an alleged Policeman after he refused to hand over the iced tea he'd just bought, highlights the Delusion of Power and Grandeur adopted by the police State.
Presumably, the can of drink he'd just bought from the shop, outside which he was apprehended by this strange man, was really a bomb in disguise!
I have described my personal experiences of the UK's Police State, which is similarly reaching heights of absurdity. I am a medical doctor of many years standing and was working as a GP (General Practitioner) in a rural area of England, near a tiny village. I had never been arrested or charged and knew little about the workings of the Police. Two plain clothed officers, who were not in a marked police car, knocked on the door un-announced one evening, were insulting before accusing both me and my husband of things we had no knowledge of.
They demanded entry into our home and when we refused, arrested us and used this as an excuse to enter our home and rifle though our belongings.
The Police State, for certain individuals (victims) and for certain ethnic groups, has been around for a while. It was based in secrecy, lies and dependence on a high moral ground, often provided to them by the mainstream media, in convincing the masses, they were living in the land of the free and everything was democratic. Since 9/11 and the corrupt usage of the term "national security" we have had to endure the added oppression by the security forces and Military Intelligence tactics in controlling the populace by mass hypnosis. (There will be more on this topic posted shortly).
Please also see post on Crypto-fascism, below and Opinion page.
Crypto-facism:The furtherance of the State's fascist agenda by occult means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up-dated: Tuesday 30th April 2013
The Secret Shame of the British System: An Institutional Assault
This, even though the GMC has decided otherwise. This is unprecedented action and therefore discriminatory, as the employer cannot over-rule the decision of the regulatory body in this way, until a full determination has been heard. The NHS (National Health Service) held a hearing, without my knowledge or representation, which they termed a "Tribunal". Again, unprecedented, and a distinctly non-medical term; the term Tribunal being more fitting in the Military.
How members of the UK Police Force LIED to social services (Children's Services) in order to trigger an "emergency assessment of my children:
I have written posts below regarding the activities of members of the UK police, NHS employees (including doctors and GPs), social services and even the mainstream media, in false casting aspersions about my character as a professional (a doctor) as well as a mother, wife and even as a Human Being.
I've described below how two plain clothed police arrived at my home making seemingly bizarre accusations and allegations against both me and my husband, requested entry into the home, and on our refusal XXXX us both and later alleged XXXX. I have since asked a lawyer to make a case against the UK Police based on this wrongful XXXX and the following false XXXX.
Although a case has been made and I have been advised I have a very good chance of winning this case, there have been many 'delays', in actually getting this case into the inside of a UK Court.
In addition, the same XXXX went onto tell LIES to social services, in a meeting I had no knowledge of, even insinuating there was a risk I was trying to KILL my own children! All this to gain access to the children via a compulsory assessment and given the accusations perhaps even a ploy to remove my children from my care and place them in the hands of a "carer" of their choice.
Give the recent scandal concerning the alleged Elite Paedophile
Ring in the UK, involving collusion by individuals in all the institutions, including in the XXXX, in social services/workers responsible for children in care homes and in foster
care, even doctors in the NHS, psychiatrists in forensic hospitals
and not to mention MPs Lords, Ladies and God knows who else, I think my case, one that I publicized in May 2012, a few months before the UK scandal came to light, is poignant and relevant as an example of how the Institutions collude to "snatch" children away, for their own pleasures and ritual sacrifices that have been described as satanic in origin.
As far as my own case goes, my lawyer has requested information pertaining to the meeting held with the XXXX and where minutes were recorded. Several legal letter and telephone calls directly from my lawyer, the individuals at this
department of social services, have refused to release this information. It seems there is something to hide...?
Human Rights legislation gives everyone the Right to a Fair Trial, No Punishment Without Law, as enshrined in the EHCR:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The GMC has behaved in an unbelievable manner, aberrant in every way, according to my past 20 years experiences of the medical profession and 5 years in a medical school: It has provided no further evidence of any wrong-doing on my part for over a year, yet spent tax-payers money to seek an extension of the investigation, granted a few months ago. Despite, the time elapsed since then, no further evidence has been forth-coming, and it all appears to be engineered to prevent me from working, earning a living and supporting my family, not to mention a waste of my medical expertise, granted to me at tax-payer's expense.
I guess I'll be termed a 'scrounger' like the rest of us.
That's why I term this treatment an "institutional assault". In conjunction with the methods I describe in Crypto-fascism (please see Opinion page), the System seeks to diminish it's chosen victims, the sacrificial lambs, by first depriving them of monetary funds via unemployment, black-listing, reputation damage and malicious references, before moving onto other essential issues such as housing and health-care. I have heard of numerous cases such as these, even in the United States as well as in Europe.
More on this Human Rights Violation, to follow. Thanks for listening.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I do note that in the UK scandal the social workers and their Institution, appear to be beyond any criticism or investigation. Perhaps, they are being protected by the 'Ring'.
Updated: Thursday 18th April 2013
The FALSIFYING of Public records to stop me from WORKING and practising as a doctor in the UK and abroad.
To those who have been following my case in the UK, thank you for your continuing support and interest. To new followers, I'll give you a short synopsis to aid understanding, but please feel free to contact me on twitter (Rapinder@RoadrunnerA) if you have any questions or email me at, rapinder.adekola@gmail.com and I'll be sure to reply. (Trolls need not apply).
A new development, astonishing even to me, after all I've seen, is that the GMC (General Medical Council, the professional regulatory body in the UK for medical doctors), has changed its website to FALSELY state that I am a doctor who has been "suspended" and has been disallowed from practising Medicine in
the UK.
This is a lie. This change to the published records, which prospective employers would refer to, was recent and coincidentally, as I begun an employment search, and had even met (a representative of) a prospective employer.
I have since been informed by the same employer, that until this website is changed, I cannot be offered employment.
Four weeks later and despite legal representation, the GMC has still not changed their website and has even informed me that as a result of this website change, which does not reflect reality, namely being that I AM allowed to practise as a doctor and GP (General Practitioner in the UK), they will not
issue any documents to any employer outside the UK.
(Registering bodies outside the UK often ask for certification from the 'home' registering body). Thereby potentially preventing me from working abroad as well as in the UK!
In effect it is not only an untruth, published and available in the public domain and therefore also a defamation of professional character, this action is also intended to prevent me from earning a living, supporting my family and practising my art; Medicine. Some of the other Human Rights violations, imposed upon me and my family in the UK are listed as follows and are described in detail on this page and others:
- 1993: Right to Privacy: Film made by Channel 4 about my relationship with my husband, called 'Bhaji on the Beach'.
- http://www.rapinderadekola.yolasite.com/quotes-and-background-to-case.php
- 1993: Right to marriage
- 2011: Case made by NHS and GMC, has been shown to be based on malicious gossip and hearsay, as even admitted by the GMC itself, yet an unproductive "investigation" continues, casting unfounded aspersions on my character.
- 2011: Wrongful XXXX, false XXXX. I do note that in the UK scandal the social workers and illegal surveillance (latter since 1994) on me and my family by UK XXXX. Wrongful use of an XXXX just to enter and search a private residence, to 'seize' belongings.
- 2011: Right not to be tried for the alleged wrongs of another/one's spouse
- 2011: Rights to a Family Life without harassment: Lies told by UK XXXX to social services could have caused a wrongful removal of my children from parental care.
- 2011-2013: Right to legal advice but also a Right to 'effective' legal representation, should be included.
There's more about my case below. The actions of individuals working in the NHS who have used public funds to wage this malicious persecution, including the hiring of a Private investigator to follow me from my home in the UK, all the way to Australia, makes for despicable reading.The list goes on and I haven't described the events from 1993-2011 due to time restrictions. XXXX XXXX XXXX I made these allegations in May 2012, just before the UK Elite Paedophile Ring scandal.
However, you must realise that my rights ultimately will equate to your rights.
The ones in the know, those enmeshed in the British System, are "sworn to secrecy" in defence of their 'Crown', but there are those British citizens who continue to be victimised, bullied and harassed, often to death, amounting to nothing less than torture by this same 'system', whilst others look on or turn their heads away.
This is a crime and an act of criminals, posing as just and upstanding members of society.
For Queen and Country...
I feel you should know that what happens to me , might happen to you later, as those in Power have "got away with it" already so can try it on others, in order to control and oppress the masses.
However, even for those in Power, who always seek the MORAL HIGH GROUND, and at least want to be seen occupying this position in public, and especially on the World platform, this move of arbitrarily and falsely changing records to reflect LIES, in order to stop an individual from having gainful employment, is quite extraordinary.
Next, it could be your records.
What if... you suddenly found you had a criminal record, when perhaps you had never even seen the inside of a XXXX station.
What if... no matter what you said, the relevant authority refused to change this publicly available information.
What if...even your lawyer asked for these lies to be changed, and he even made representation on your behalf, but this was to no effect?
What if... you were sacked from your job because of this change in public records and no other employer wanted to give you a job?
What if... all this happened to you, yet you weren't living in North Korea or Cuba...you were in the UK, in the so-called democratic West?
What if...?
IRONY: Defence of the "Crown"
Know your history and understand that the British crown, currently worn by Queen Elizabeth II, carries a "magical stone", a diamond, the Kohi-Noor, stolen from India during 'The Raj', and meant to have been worn by an Indian queen, but taken, probably by an Agent of the Crown, and given to Queen Victoria, thus bestowing Victoria with the title, Empress of India.
Rumours exist (sometimes you have to read the so-called fiction to find out the truth) that the British agent was sent on a mission to steal the diamond from the Indian queen/princess, who owned it. It is said he removed the precious gem from her royal bedroom, whilst being seduced (or vice versa!).
The Crown itself also has a velvet material within it, as a Royal Indian crown would always have a head covering, to represent a turban or a veil. From my knowledge of history, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the traditional European style crown was devoid of material, such as velvet, in the middle.
Only a woman is allowed to wear it, as apparently it curses a man who attempts to wear it. The story goes that, "whoever wears the Koh-i-noor, rules the World. 'Koh-i-noor' translates as 'Light of the World'.
The coronation of George VI pictured below, shown wearing the Crown.
Read more about the Kohi-Noor on Wikipedia:-
Also, more on Indian Palace life (fictional) on youtube:
Traditional Indian style of singing, a qwali, featured below.
In my opinion, the British common-wealth, was based on the theft of other such items, from many other countries.
Another famous diamond in the British Crown Jewels originates from South Africa.
Pictured below the 'Great Star of Africa' known as the Cullinan diamond, mounted in the Sceptre with the Cross.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Updated: Friday 13th December 2012
A Football (soccer) Analogy to describe the anomaly of having a Probation Service working from my medical practice:
Please see details and pics below of how an arm of the UK Ministry of Justice, the Probation Service, that monitors criminalised individuals, came to facilitate its service from a doctors' surgery and in the same corridor I worked as a
General Practitioner, from 2006 (just after I started working
there) to 2010 (not long before I left).
Pictured below is the patients' waiting room in the doctors practice, and was also used by the Probation Officer for her clients.
I have explained the process of CRYPTO-FACISM, a term coined by Mr Adekola, that perfectly describes an underground, occult State-endorsed victimisation and criminalisation and ambush of certain individuals in order to "progress" the State's agenda. A process that can only be defined as fascist and mostly racist.
The Probation Service were not where they were supposed to be and State guidelines on such matters clearly state that such services, the NHS and Criminal Justice, serve completely different functions and therefore should be separated. During my almost 20 years in the medical profession and working in
NHS hospitals and health centres, I have never come across the Probation Service or had them working from an office opposite mine, seeing 'clients' rather than patients. However, my doctor colleagues at the same practice did not seem to think this was odd at all.
Just like a football player, the Criminal Justice system, via Northampton Probation service were consistently OFFSIDE.
That is, the Probation Service were offside when scoring and before any allegations of an offence were made in 2011, or even, before any offence was potentially committed.
They were in the medical practice before 2011, between 2006-2010.
The National Health Service (NHS) allowed the Probation Service to work from the practice, and the General Medical Council (GMC) and their lawyers,the linesmen in this analogy, now feel they can judge on the basis of this blatant 'offside' and allow the 'illegal' goals to be scored by the Criminal Justice System.
The Truth cannot be created on the basis of a lie.
Incidentally, I chose Manchester United as the football team example, only because the GMC recently moved their hearing offices from London, where they had been based for decades, to Manchester in the North of England.
The BBC relatively recently, also moved their regulatory hearing offices from London to the North, as pictured above.
Breaking News: 12.12.12 brings an unusual event to Manchester, in the an earthquake reported as 2.5-3.0 on the Richter scale.
Further Football Analogy to describe the Police's variation of the arrest charge:
Constantly shifting the goal-posts:
Please see post below, dated 9th November 2012. This details the case against the UK XXXX.[PARTS OF THIS POST HAVE BEEN REMOVED FOR LEGAL REASONS- MAY 2014]
Updated: Friday 23rd November 2012
The forensic psychiatrist, my GMC interview and questions about the viability of my marriage......
I am starting to round up my case, as presented on this website , against the UK State. I have spoken about the film made in 1993, by a Sikh female director, called Bhaji on the Beach (please see My Background page for more details
about this and Barings Bank). I have also mentioned below, how the UK's professional regulatory body for doctors, the General Medical Council (the GMC), alleged and apparent attempted theft of my wedding certificate, back in 1997.
More recently, there has been the organised institutional assault against me and my family, that includes children, whilst I was working as a GP (General Practitioner) in Northamptonshire, England. This attack was by individuals, mostly XXXX working in the NHS, but included collusion with the local XXXX force, and with social services/education. These actions culminated
in a falsified complaint about me professionally, as a doctor being made to the GMC, supposedly by people in esteemed positions, such as Professors, within the NHS.
The same NHS then leaked information to the UK mainstream media as well as in Australia, where I had been offered employment.
The case continues, although no-one can really seem to explain why, as here has been no compelling evidence made against me (more details about this also given below).
I have spoken about the UK Home Office, and their involvement as well as how a form was sent to me by the GMC, that challenged all privacy tenets in current Human Rights legislation (please see post below).
More recently, I've spoken about the GP practice I worked in, in England, and how a group of individuals also working there, lead by a XXXX and XXXX, were allegedly involved in occult Intelligence practices, aimed to harm me and my family.
I have, in the most recent post below, tried to explain how these practices are related to Military Intelligence knowledge and the process of Crypto-fascism, this term defined below.
Aerial view of RAF Croughton, near Brackley, pictured below:
I have also explained how the UK Probation Service, an arm of the Criminal Justice System, were given a clinical room in the same GP practice and in nearby office where I worked seeing patients (see photos of practice, below).
The TRUTH cannot be created on the foundation of a LIE.
- What was the Probation Service doing in a Doctors surgery?
- Why were they based there only after I started working there?
- Complaints about this "inappropriate mixing of services" did eventually lead to the removal of this arm of the Ministry of Justice, from the doctors' practice, but only a year before I was put in a position of resigning, due to discriminatory treatment from my colleagues (also doctors).
This lack of functional separation between organisations, as stated in government guidelines, was allowed by the governing local NHS body (NHS PCT Primary Care Trust) from 2006, just after the time I started working at this health centre to the time a complaint was made about this mixing of clients and patients, directly to the same local Probation Service in 2009. This complaint removed the Probation Service from the health
centre. As yet, neither the GPs I worked with who were responsible for this activity, nor the local NHS has been able to give any explanation as to why a Probation Officer and her criminalised clients were allowed to conduct meetings
in a health centre GP practice. My accusation against both the NHS who allowed and the local Probation Service who work closely with the Police and Criminal Justice system, was that there was a pre-meditated agenda to criminalise by organs of the State.
CRYPTO-FACISM in this sense was the alleged use of criminal spirits in necromancy by a female individual deployed by the State, the alleged Probation Officer. That is, to seek to possess a body/host victim with the soul of a dead criminal, to then guide that spirit to commit a crime. This is known by the ones in the know, as "crime pushing", as depicted, to some extent, in the movie, Push. This, in effect, gives many of those criminalized by the State, in this hidden way, a moral superiority over the Institution, who is involved in an agenda equivalent to the Black Holocaust.
All the above eventually culminated in what had been aimed for, in a wrongful XXXX by the XXXX last year (please see pictures of XXXX below- these have since been removed for legal reasons-May 2014) but as no crime had been committed and there had not even been any wrongdoing, no XXXX were brought. However, the XXXX at the medical practice in England, "determined" to still make a case to the GMC, so instead wrote a skewed and fabricated report that cast serious aspersions on my mental state and hence, my ability to work as a GP. This action was recommended by the NHS.
No complaints had been made to the GMC by patients, since or before. This event then paved the way for individuals at the GMC, who had never met me,to diagnose me with "Paranoid Personality Disorder", a diagnosis I label as "the Gagging Diagnosis" (please see posts below about this). Consequently, I was asked to see two GMC psychiatrists and the GMC hinted that if I refused to see them, this would allow them to cast further judgement on my mental state.
One set of legal advice was to the contrary, and I was advised to see an independent psychiatrist instead. I was confident enough, however, to agree to seeing the two State-endorsed shrinks, and the pseudo-diagnosis of Paranoia was subsequently not made by them.
Paranoid Personality Disorder: Labels and false diagnoses
The Psychiatric interview...
So, this brings me to the role of the Psychiatrists I saw, particularly one of them, and why certain anomalies in my meeting with him cannot be dismissed:
The GMC literature I received, before the interview, on the subject of the 'psychiatric health assessments' stated I would be seeing a General psychiatrist.This makes perfect sense, as there are many sub-specialitys in this subject, just as there are in other subjects of Western medicine.
For example, Forensic Psychiatry deals with the criminally insane, and those patients are quite often in locked wards because they are deemed to be a danger to the public.
For example, the hospital, Broadmoor, currently implicated in he Jimmy Savile Paedophile Ring case. Such patients may have committed a crime such as murder because, for example, they were under the false perception, the victim was going to kill them, when actually the victim did not even know the patient.
February 2012, 6 months after the original complaint:
During the interview, he continually said that I was employed by the NHS,which I was not, as if this was a good enough reason for the local NHS Trust to have abused my privacy and that of my family in the way described in posts below, including breaching all confidentiality issues. However, I was not employed by the NHS and had not held any form of contract with them.
For example, the hospital, Broadmoor, currently implicated in he Jimmy Savile Paedophile Ring case. Such patients may have committed a crime such as murder because, for example, they were under the false perception, the victim was going to kill them, when actually the victim did not even know the patient.
Other sub-specialitys, include Personality Disorders, Child Psychiatry etc.
February 2012, 6 months after the original complaint:
I was asked to see a Forensic Psychiatrist. This was unusual as I had not committed or been charged with any crime. This particular forensic psychiatrist was also retired and had never completed a GMC assessment of this kind before. He seemed to be very new to it, and later the GMC questioned his
concluding remarks on my interview with him. The other psychiatrist I was asked to see was a General psychiatrist, and was well versed in GMC assessments and also was still working as a consultant in an NHS hospital, and had not been 'brought out of retirement'.
Furthermore, this forensic psychiatrist was rather high profile: He sat on a national parole board, in a high position and had been involved in high profile patient cases, shown in the media. Clearly, the nature of his previous work would have meant close links with the Police.
My interview with the other psychiatrist, was routine and what I would have expected of a psychiatric assessment, such as the questions asked and the demeanour of the psychiatrist and relaxed mood of the interview.
The forensic psychiatrist cross-examined me for 2 hours (over and above the time allocated to him for the interview by the GMC), as if he was the prosecuting lawyer for the NHS!! Neither did the GMC send this doctor all the information relating to the case and large parts of the legal bundle of documents were missing.
During the interview, he continually said that I was employed by the NHS,which I was not, as if this was a good enough reason for the local NHS Trust to have abused my privacy and that of my family in the way described in posts below, including breaching all confidentiality issues. However, I was not employed by the NHS and had not held any form of contract with them.
Repeated questions about my marriage...
However, the most unusual part of his questioning over the two hours, also very relevant in this case is his asking me on 5 separate occasions about my marriage:
- At the start of the interview he asked me a direct question about 'how I felt my marriage was?' In the context of the general psychiatric interview, and relationships with others and ones' family this can be deemed appropriate.
- However, later in the interview, and seemingly out of the blue whist speaking on other topics, he asked me if 'I thought my marriage would survive?'
- Later, he asked me, 'why are you still in this marriage?' At which point I felt angry but did not want to be provoked by this shrink, who would then probably have written a report that I was irrationally angry!
- Lastly, near the end of the interview, he asked me 'whether I would be staying in this marriage?'
I don't believe this was appropriate and certainly when I worked as a psychiatrist I would never have conducted an interview as a cross examination, or repeatedly ask the same question, when this was not what the case was about. Similarly, his report held a disproportionate chunk of material on my husband and my marriage, rather than the case made by the XXXX and the ex-
employer.
Do individuals of the UK State have a right to threaten my career over the nature of my marriage...?
Lastly, he asked me whether I believed I was subject to an "organised and malicious attack by a mafia like group of people" as I had written in my statement. I felt the premise of his question on this was that if I stuck to my belief and what I had said I would be labelled as 'paranoid'. However, I stuck to
my belief and felt the diagnosis of "mad or not mad" should be made according to the State-endorsed forensic psychiatrist, regardless.
The Human right to family life and marriage...
The Human Rights Act as enshrined in the European Convention for Human Rights (ECHR) does allow one to marry and have a family without discrimination and it is on this premise that I believe I have just cause to claim asylum from the UK.
Updated:22nd November 2012
Addendum added below: 3rd/12th December 2012:
NHS Psychiatrists and their role in CRYPTO-FACISM...
Mr Adekola coined the term Crypto-facism: "The pursuance by the State, of a facist agenda, by the use of necromancy".
Necromancy is the use of dead spirits in the hypnosis and control of an individual/s or even the masses. How does the State falsely criminalise its citizens and why does it seek to do this? If imprisonment is not achieved, the next step is a severe "psychological insult".
In the modern day, we have been lead to believe that our dreams are meaningless, just a way of psychoanalysing our fears, at best, or even just a muddle of our thoughts and actions during our waking life. What the State does not want us to know is that our dreams mean more to 'it' than you could possibly imagine, or dream of!
The function of Science generally, it could also be argued, is to cut us off from out intuitive selves and our dreaming lives.
The secret art of necromancy has been practised for eons, with harsh consequences, in the past, for those caught at it. However, the UK State has turned into an accepted culture for those within the "system", those who profit from such nefarious activities, and it is also very organised within the institutions. The Jimmy Savile case, you maybe aware, extends to NHS hospitals, nurses and psychiatrists, and I have insider knowledge on how CRYPTO-FASCISM, and all this entails, similarly involves those who are supposedly held in high esteem by society. (I am not an insider in that I was ever involved in this or part of any group involved in this. Quite the opposite, I was, have been and still am a victim of the UK system and its culture of crypto-fascism. It is as a result of these attacks, or this 'institutional assault', if you will, that both myself and my husband have built up this knowledge. I would like to share it with you).
I can explain how possession occurs and how this can be used to
criminalise and cause illness. The whole point is for the State to IMPRISON and control minds within it's preferred environment. That is, either within a jail cell or a psychiatric bed. We call it fascist also because it is largely a racist activity- the victims are usually Black. It was, and is how slavery has been secretly continued even after being abolished.
To side track for a minute on the subject of occult slavery: Shortly after Tony Blair, picture above, came into power in 1997, he decided to ask for the REPEAL of the Slavery Abolition Act 1833. His request was successful and meant this ancient Act was now REMOVED from Law. In fact this was one of the first legislative actions Tony Blair took on the assumption of office in 1997. Why after all these years was the removal of the Slavery Abolition Act so important to to New Labour? At the time, the reason given was that this Act was no longer relevant to modern day life. Almost one year later, in 1998, the Human Rights Act came into play, and one of the tenets of this Act does allude to slavery. However, on searching online for information, the reason now given for repealing the 1833 Act is that the Human Rights Act had already incorporated anti-slavery within it. I followed this closely at the time, as it was very relevant
to the "institutional assault" both me and my husband were experiencing: The 1833 Act was repealed before the Human Rights Act even existed or before it had even been mentioned at all by the mainstream media, to the best of my recollection.
So, why the rush to repeal the Slavery Abolition Act 160+ years later? My accusation is that the Blair government wanted to continue an occult/hidden slavery, without any confines of UK Law.
See also Opinion page on Blair era spin doctoring and the black arts of controlling the masses.
A "Bond" could also be described as someone who is in bondage, that is enslaved. The State falsely criminalises, either via a set-up or Crypto-fascism, to then allow imprisonment of the 'bond' and allow him/her to be "used" some more.
I will be writing more on "possession", how the State deploys mediums (also known colloquially as spooks), to carry out this activity and how it is achieved.
More to follow on this subject. The above picture shows necromancers in a church yard, having raised a dead spirit. Necromancers, were known to buy houses close to graveyards, and at during several points through history, there have been spates of grave robbing. Body parts or even hair and nails of the dead person are used in an incantation to call the spirit of the deceased. In modern day times we have individuals within the NHS who work within the UK State 'system' and will illegally and unethically supply body parts to their cult, and use them for necromancy and to possess others, including children.
In ancient times, such voodoo practices were very harshly punishable. In modern times, they are organised, routine and acceptable as a way of promoting the UK State and it's agenda.
What are spooks? In my view it refers to those individuals deployed by the State Intelligence department, to conduct secretive bullying and victimisation, using occult practices. Such people are often mediums or are from a sub-culture that specialises in such, otherwise unusual, activities.
In my experience, a function of the State and the Intelligence Service in the Crypto-fascist process, is the deployment of occult-ists to "attack" the victim. Such hidden, or occult attacks, carry the same importance in the Military as conventional gun attacks, and often have similarly debilitating effects on the
victim.
Note that the Haitan's knowledge of African traditional medicine and black magic, originates from West Africa and such tribes as the Yoroba, now in present day, post-colonial Nigeria. Such practices have migrated from Africa to the Carribbean and even to some parts of the US such as New Orleans.
The State deploys those it can "use" for such attacks, in return for Home Office favours such as Immigration rights or a Green card.
The Other groups specialising in such practices and are particularly vulnerable to favours (The State's bribes such as migration rights) in exchange for attacking the victim are 'travellers'.
I came across the TV show recently, The Riches, pictured below. Season 1, Episodes 1 and 2, are about ID fraud and the Irish traveller's community in the US. In the real world this translates merely to the threat of a passport or other photo ID cards. In the occult world, this is the "taking over" of another person's body in order to take their destiny, including their home, land, money and other possessions. In the film, the travellers Wayne and his wife, take the names and of identities of the dead but affluent couple. Wayne calls himself Mr Rich, Mr Doug Rich. The name Rich is obvious in this context, but also Doug could be referring to the money stolen from the couple and 'dug' or hidden underground.
Just to side-track for a moment, the name taken in this fictional occult identity theft scenario, Mr Rich, reminds me of the Scottish man, Madonna married, Mr Guy Ritchie. Could have been known as 'The Rich Guy', if the same principle was applied!
The Madonna and the Rich Guy, 2000, pictured below:
Identity theft involves dream/destiny theft and in the occult 'world' convincing fate you are the victim.
After his marriage, Guy Ritchie went onto direct a film, 'Snatch', starring Brad Pitt as an Irish boxer, in 2000.
Twitter tweet by Anti-Celebrity @AntiCelebrity
"Celebrities are despicably counterrevolutionary entities; the purpose of their existence is to distract the masses from revolution".
and:
"Hollywood psychologically abuses millions of women who end up hating their self-image because of the films' poisonous beauty ideals".
"May you always walk in sunshine. May you never want for more. May Irish angels rest their wings right beside your door"~Irish Proverb
The word "snatch", used colloquially, refers to the theft of a woman's purse or handbag; A snatch of a purse. This is also an occult way of stealing a woman's identity and destiny and involves the use of a black and white dog as shown in
the poster above. More to follow on this subject...!!
Single White Female is a 1992 American thriller film based on John Lutz's
novel SWF Seeks Same. This film could be analysed using psycho-babble and psychiatric diagnoses such as "Borderline Personality Disorder", but in my view and due to my direct personal experience of such matters, I would say the room-mate in this film, played by Jennifer Jason Leigh, is attempting an occult ID snatch from the protagonist who advertised for a room-mate played by Bridget Fonda. In doing this, the new room-mate slowly changes her appearance, clothes and hairstyle to copy the girls she now lives with and wants to emulate so badly. This "copying" even extends to taking her boyfriend and by manipulating events to break up the relationship! I describe this on this website as occult ID fraud.
Also related to this subject is my post on Sexual Abuse Rings and the film 'Eyes Wide Shut' on the Opinion page.Taking the IDENTITY of another woman via occult means involves taking the 'essence' of the woman and also requires penetration via occult rape or non-consensual sex (more on this in previous posts also).When the ID or purse snatch is State-endorsed, then it involves many sharing the stolen purse, that is, the ID of the victim, and essentially in the essence of the woman-hood itself.
I allege that in my case it has been occult, secretive and State-endorsed, to the Royal family itself. Hence, the title of this story:
The Secret Shame of the British System: An Institutional Assault.
The alleged PAEDOPHILE rings in the UK are very much related to this, as the same process can be inflicted on children, particularly young girls.
State deployment of occultists to victimise and ambush citizens:
Sorry, I side-tracked, so back to the subject...! In my personal experience, such people, as described earlier in this post, are taken to battle stations in working for UK State 'Intelligence occult ops department'. (I have made up this name but it is largely accurate, for want of a better description).
The spiral of HYPNOSIS, allows the State to control our dream selves and hence, our waking lives. Such knowledge is not allowed to be FREELY available. "Brain-washing" by the State is ultimately done to achieve an identity change. Stealing someone else's IDENTITY means more than just a passport. In the occult sense, it is akin to stealing someone else's life and dreams, and even their very soul. However, this is not that simple and involves spirit possession, until the victim's inherent spirit has been "taken over" by a another, that is, a dead person's spirit.
In my view, this type of ID theft is the ultimate crime (see also post below on theft of my wedding certificate by the GMC (General Medical Council, the UK professional regulatory body for doctors), and one the State has been able to get away with repeatedly. "Extraordinary rendition" is an example of this, and I have previously written about this too, below.
After graduating from medical school, I studied and trained in the speciality of Psychiatry in London, England for several years, prior to becoming a General Practitioner (GP).
I have worked as a Psychiatrist in many NHS hospitals in and around London and the UK.
COMING UP: More to follow on the psychiatrists role .......
Details have been removed for legal reasons-May 2014
Updated: Wednesday 14th November 2012:
- Please also see addendum at the end of the last post, 11th November 2012:
Telephones, Communications Industry, Hypnosis and
The Curse of the Jade Scorpion...
- Additional addendum in last post below, regarding UK Main Stream Media (MSM), and their various agendas under:
NHS DOCTORS FABRICATING EVIDENCE?
Updated: Sunday 11th November 2012:
The post below talks of the attempted theft of wedding certificate by the GMC many years ago, when I asked for my surname to be changed to my marital name. This level of corruption has only worsened exponentially as the years have gone on. Posts below also describe the lack of probity shown by NHS employees, doctors and other staff in this case that involves me and my family. Despite, rather serious complaints made by me to the GMC regarding these individuals and their actions, none of them have been asked, by the GMC, to answer the allegations I have made. In fact, the same XXXX, have gone onto make false witness statements, that is, they have lied in legal documents that can be used in a Court of Law. More on 'fabricating evidence', below.
I was trained as a doctor at medical school but the NHS hospitals were also largely responsible for those years of intensive training. I also worked in NHS hospitals for many years, in many different places in the UK and within different specialities.
However, any organisation that can display this level of corruption, even towards its own employees, can only crumble, and in my opinion, deserves to FALL. I certainly won't be fighting for it.
After the XXXX concluded their interviews and investigation, no charges were brought to either me and my husband.
This did not prevent my ex-employer from starting his "own" investigation, afresh. This was despite the fact, the allegations against me were not regarding my work as a doctor and neither did they involve the work premises or equipment at the GP practice. Neither was my husband, Mr Adekola, a doctor
or an employee of this GP practice, but in making such enquiries, this ex-employer had, in effect broken all Mr Adekola's privacy rights, as well as bizarrely taking on a role of detective. Neither could this GP, doctor and ex-employer, ever act objectively, and in fact the practice were far from objective
(see below). The doctors at the NHS PCT (Primary Care Trust- deals with GP practices) in Northamptonshire, with whom I was not employed also acted illegally and unethically by accessing both mine and my young daughter's medical records on the central computer network that only the NHS department had access to. So, they also abused their power and status in doing this.
A public health doctor, at the local NHS Trust in Northampton, then assigned an NHS administrator, whose background allegedly appears to be with the Police, to take on the role of finding me and my family! I stress that this was after I had resigned from the post in Brackley and moved house from the local area. This NHS employee, the assigned "investigator" was paid an NHS salary, courtesy of the British taxpayer. There was no reason to try and "track" me after I had resigned from the position in the local area, and neither was I an employee of the NHS but of a GP practice, which is privately run. However, these NHS individuals appear to have gone to extraordinary lengths to find out where me and my family were
residing behaving almost as if I had stolen NHS funds and left the area or that I was a fugitive, which I patently was not.
Again, this Private Investigator, wholes invoice to the NHS was included in the GMC case bundle, was paid for courtesy of the British tax-payer. It's good to know you are the ones paying for my harassment and stalking of my family!
The NHS assigned detective to find out where I had moved to, apparently at 'any cost necessary', also went to the bizarre efforts of tracing our mail to a re-directed address in London. How the NHS were given a confidential re-direction address is a matter also for the Royal Mail who have strict contractual obligations regarding confidentiality of the non-forwarding of
addresses to third parties.
Even more sinister the NHS appears to have had access to confidential information kept on my children, by their school teacher. The children's last head teacher, Mrs Fiona Toman as we had moved from the locality of the school and therefore my children no longer attended there then wrote me a SHOCKING email, informing me that as my children were no longer at the school she had placed my children on a "MISSING" list. This was strange as I had already informed the head teacher that my children no longer required school places having moved from the area.This head teacher informed social services that as my children had spoken about going on holiday abroad, they guessed Nigeria or maybe France, that that therefore they could be "at risk".The bizarre message seemed to be, that as parents, we were not allowed to remove our children from the local area or the school otherwise we would be referred to social services and tracked by the NHS!
This school also has questions to answer, but my point is howthe UK launches an institutional assault, the schools and education system being a large part of this, in conjunction with the social services department.These actions also aid understanding of how occult pedophile rings can exists in secret, and how such individuals within the UK 'system' can infiltrate any institution.
NHS DOCTORS/GPs ACTING UNETHICALLY
The XXXX XXXX both myself and my husband falsely and we are already making a claim against the XXXX about this as well as their other mis-demeanours. However, this did not stop my ex-employer, in Brackley, from conducting their own investigation whereby I was again interrogated, as if by Police, in a separate meeting. I was later informed that this interview had been secretly filmed, presumably using hidden camera equipment (paid for by the NHS tax payer?), as no cameras
were visible in the room whilst I was being interviewed. Neither did I give consent to any filming and this was done without my knowledge. A Smoke alarm, pictured below:
[Details have been removed for legal reasons- May 2014]
NHS DOCTORS FABRICATING EVIDENCE?
The concluded their investigation within days and the CPS dropped the case within a day. The ex-employer, decided to take on the responsibility of continuing the investigation. Presumably, this could have impacted on time available for patient healthcare. During this time, I was kept suspended, on full pay, by the doctors/GPs from practising at this medical practice. Despite my protests, this suspension lasted for 3 months. During this time, locum doctors were employed by the practice to see patients on my behalf. These locum doctors would have been on on temporary locum rates of pay, considerably higher than I was being paid. All at British tax-payers expense.
After both the XXXX investigation was dropped and the ex-employer investigation that lasted 3 months, similarly resulted in nothing more than a Spanish inquisition, doctors at the local NHS Trust, decided to contact the General Medical Council, the regulatory body for doctors in the UK, the GMC.
However, the Employer was then asked to prepare a "special" report. This document, requested by the NHS for a GMC referral, I can only loosely described as a report, amounted to nothing less than fabricating evidence, in my opinion.
This was written by a doctor and a GP who continues to practise in the UK: The Employer took sound-bites of emails, conversations and even events, and tried to give a very skewed picture of my character, personally and professionally, and essentially asserted that I was mentally ill and unfit to practise as a doctor and a GP. I imagine the time taken to complete this report, which was remarkably lengthy and detailed, could have impacted on patient care time.
It appears that this report was requested by the NHS, after their high brow lawyer (probably costing thousands of pounds, according to my legal team, and therefore costing the British taxpayer) advised them that as there was no police case or charges, I could only be labelled as paranoid, given my argument in defence of the allegations. The Employer, who is not a psychiatrist, and neither is she someone I ever met with regularly or knew well on a personal basis, took the step of allegedly creating a false and defamatory document, apparently, in order to give the NHS referral to the GMC more standing. The Employer, from case evidence, appears to have been working very closely with the assigned NHS funded "tracker" from the NHS Trust in Northampton (see posts above).
Addendum added 14th November 2012:
Please note that the journalist from the Sunday Telegraph and the unfair and negative article that initiated this website, sent two reporters to Australia to look for me, presumably thinking I would speak to them.
Link to the Sunday Telegraph article:
Clearly, this would have been at considerable expense, although not at tax payers expense, thank fully. I have alleged that the information was leaked by the NHS and the same individuals mentioned above and employed by the local NHS department (now called "directorate".), who I have alleged are guilty of a
gross misuse of public funds and a malfeasance. The Telegraph reporters did not manage to locate me, but they did speak to a
neighbour in the village.
One of the GPs at this medical practice also started working at the practice just after I started working there. Similarly, two other receptionists only started working there after I did, both army wives, who were linked to RAF Croughton, a barracks nearby,as was the practice manager at that time.
RAF (Royal Air Force) CROUGHTON, pictured below is also a Communications Centre, and US Army base, and is within close proximity to the medical practice in Brackley:
I will be on Twitter, so contact me @RoadrunnerA.
-----------------------------------------------------------
ADDENDUM added: Wednesday 14th November 2012:
Telephones, Communications Industry, Hypnosis and
The Curse of the Jade Scorpion..............
British Telecommunications are also present at the Communications Centre in RAF Croughton, Oxfordshire.
Scene from the film, The Matrix, shown below.
The Curse of the Jade Scorpion, a film by Woody Allen wonderfully illustrates Hypnosis and the use of the TELEPHONE ring tone to initiate the hypnotic spiral, and the further use of TRIGGER words the hypnotist uses to control the victims.
The hypnotist, in the turban, has both leading characters under total hypnotic control and is able to ask them to commit a crime of theft. He telephones them, using the RING tone as a SIGNAL, and then uses the word, "Madagascar", to trigger hypnotic control.
I have mentioned the use of HYPNOSIS in criminalisation, even murder-suicides, where the perpetrator has almost no memory of what s/he did. There are several high profile murder cases, whereby the 'criminal' asserts this. Again, this brings me back to CRYPTO-FACISM and the use of State-endorsed NECROMANCY, in the UK. More to follow on this subject, very soon.........!
The original film, "Curse of the Jade Scorpion", starred Bogart and Bacall, pictured above. Woody Allen's version is perfectly stylised to fit the same era.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated: Friday 9th November 2012:
THEFT OF OUR WEDDING CERTIFICATE by the GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (GMC)
The GMC is the UK regulatory body for doctors and is where a case in defence of my, and my family's, human rights in the UK is being fought.I started this website in May 2011, after the individuals in the UK National Health Service (NHS), who made a complaint to the GMC, acted maliciously and leaked defamatory information to the UK press:
THE FACTS:
I have not harmed a patient willfully or negligently, have not harmed anyone else, no complaints by a patients have been made to the GMC, and neither am I unwell mentally, or a taker of excessive alcohol or any illicit drugs. Lastly, neither have I found guilty or charged with any crime. Yet the GMC, almost 18 months later are still desperately continuing an investigation, as if to find something wrong. Presumably these efforts are to stop me from practising as a doctor and a General Practitioner (GP). Not to mention, the XXXX were the first to investigate both myself and my husband, after which the XXXX threw out the case, within a day! (Please see previous post below.)
As I said, the GMC has decided to continue investigating these bogus allegations and claims, without provided any evidence or proof of wrong doing.
GAGGING DISORDER:
Initially, when I submitted a statement to the GMC in defence of the allegations, I was diagnosed, by a GMC administrator who had not even met me and was not a doctor or psychiatrist, with the label, "Paranoid Personality Disorder" (see post below for more on this). I have since coined the term 'Gagging Disorder", as I think this adequately describes the diagnosis made.
IS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ALSO A COINCIDENCE THEORY?
In addition, no-one in the GMC appears to think that this is odd: The GP who lead Brackley Health Centre prior to myself was also referred to the GMC by the same doctors as myself. and in addition, was also asked to stop practising as a result. Hence why I took up the position.
This doctor was also Asian and from the Indian subcontinent. In this semi-rural practice in a market town in England, where both of us had worked prior to our referrals by the same staff, the rest of the medical/non-medical staff at this practice, were all white, as was 99.9% of patient population.
However, I have been "accused" of stating racism, as if it were not true and as if I am disallowed of saying so, by the same NHS individuals making the false allegations against me.
GMC STATISTICS
Statistics show that the percentage of ethnic minority doctors, non-white doctors and foreign doctors referred to the GMC is substantially higher than white doctors. In fact, this gap continues to widen.
1997: Theft of our wedding certificate by the GMC:
Anyway, this is not my only run-in with the GMC as I previously had cause to threaten them with legal action back in 1997, but this time for an entirely different reason:
To change my surname on the national doctors register, kept by the GMC, to my marital surname, I was asked to provide evidence of my marriage and forward by wedding certificate to the GMC. I was asked to provide only the original copy and not a photocopy, but was assured that the original would be returned to me via post as soon as it had been seen. When the wedding certificate had not been returned for longer than anticipated, I telephoned the GMC offices. I was informed that the wedding certificate had been lost and could not be returned. Mr Adekola then spoke to a higher manager and threatened legal action if the wedding certificate was not returned to us immediately, and questioned how it could possibly have been lost. The following day an envelope marked "Airmail" arrived through our post. It was also post-marked with a UK code, so the airmail stamp and envelope were slightly confusing.
We traced the UK post-mark to a Publishing House for scientific papers in Epsom, Surrey! On telephoning the publishing house, a senior sounding man answered and appeared taken back by our call. He affirmed that the publishing house had sent the wedding certificate and added words to the effect, "But there was an airmail stamp on it". This did not make sense to us.
When we asked the GMC to explain why the certificate had been sent to a publishing house, but they declined to comment, even when we wrote to them.
This incident, plus others over the time frame 1993-98, such as discrimination in employment, initiated a trip to our local Member of Parliament in 1998, as well as direct communication with other members of the government. Our quest for assistance was fruitless, and as I stated in the post below, the UK press refused to give us any publicity.I must add that these days, threatening legal action in the UK, has little effect, bar a knowing guffaw, if you are not part of the British System. The legal system in the UK seems to be covered and 'all sewn up'. This is the extent to which the corruption now extends, as is clearly being illustrated to the World by the recent Elite 'child paedophile ring' case.
NEGLIGENCE BY GMC OR A LACK A SEVERE OF PROBITY?
The GMC has shown itself to be lacking in PROBITY and has continued to act outside that expected for a professionals' regulatory body. As well as the attempted theft of my marriage certificate back then, (please also see My Background page regarding the film, 'Bhaji on the Beach'), on many occasions over the past year, in relation to my case, it has wilfully broken its own rules and regulations: This included disallowing me from speaking on MY OWN behalf at a hearing about my case.
Updated: Wednesday 7th November 2012:
ALLEGED FRAUDULENT REMOVAL OF MY MEDICAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE?!
I have mentioned in previous posts below of how I believe my medical indemnity cover was fraudulently removed. This insurance cover, called Medical Defence, is a prerequisite to practising as a doctor, particularly as a GP or a consultant, and without this I would not have been allowed to work. The insurance allows me access to legal advice from lawyers specialising in medical defence cases or regulatory body complaints. It is a rather expensive subscription but allows practising doctors the security of knowing they will have free legal services should any patient want to sue them, or if a complaint is made to the doctors regulatory body, in the UK the General Medical Council, the GMC.
Although, the subscriptions were paid, the defence company, MDU (Medical Defence Union, based on Blackfriars Road in the City of London) had no records of this. Hence, I was initially left without access to legal services when the complaint was made last year.
COINCIDENCE THEORIES and the SUNDAY TELEGRAPH:
Please also see first post below regarding "The Telegraph" article and my view on the general nature of this newspaper's journalism. This paper is the preferred one for the military, and in fact is the broadsheet sent to the UK military based abroad. It is also preferred by Royalists, if not the Royal family itself.
It did not surprise me that the newspaper was given information only the Employer and the local NHS PCT could have had access to, as I had already openly accused individuals who had been involved in this case, of being connected if not directly linked to the UK Military, in particular the RAF. I believe that such individuals were also employed at the health practice I last worked at. All the major UK newspapers, including 'The Telegraph' were based on Fleet Street in the City until relatively recently.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9476311/Goldman-Sachs-HQ-sold-for-264m.html
The Telegraph moved to Buckingham Place Road and its old address on Fleet Street was replaced by Goldman Sachs, UK branch:
[Details have been removed for legal reasons- May 2014]
Updated: Sunday 4th November 2012
UK XXXX will prevent legal case being brought against it.
For me the timelines for my case against the XXXX in their actions in XXXX me last year, are proving to be an attempt to FRUSTRATE and make me withdraw my case. These are the typical TACTICS used by the UK Institutions these days, and in particular the XXXX, who clearly feel they are above complaint and even the Law they are meant to uphold, the latter clearly illustrated, in my view, by the News of the World scandal.In fact this scandal also illustrates the delay tactics I am describing: Taking the case out of the public limelight and ensuring any judgement is not made until the public "forgets" all about it. Americans who read this, should know that UK subjects are exposed to the most gruelling mainstream media CONTROL, as well as subliminal advertising techniques, the world will ever see or know. The unfortunate English director, Tony Scott, who made the film "Enemy of the State" 1998, detailing future satellite surveillance techniques, was very involved in ADVERTISING in the UK. He was also in the middle of filming the latest Bond movie, Skyfall, before literally falling from the Sky himself in an 'apparent' suicide (and an apparently, non-existent brain tumour).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/9489187/Tony-Scott-wife-unaware-of-Top-Gun-directors-cancer-after-suicide.html
I have asked UK lawyers to bring a case against Northamptonshire UK Police, for almost one year:
Almost on year ago, advised to wait for new specialist lawyer in this field...few months later.....specialist lawyer is not at all experienced......contacted him anyway.....lawyer leaves practise....another lawyer starts on case.....then find out he is not even a lawyer......this para-legal takes 2 months to review papers....follow up....para-legal states case is 'complex'.......will forward to another lawyer......
And the years go on until I am probably informed it is "too late" to make a complaint against the XXXX or another similarly daft reason that can only makes sense to the Police or to lawyers....when it comes to certain clients, anyway!
Although the XXXX now say they need to "plan" a STRATEGY to arrest Elite pedophiles,
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/police-prepare-arrest-strategy-as-bbc-sexual-abuse-case-grows/
I can tell you that as far as they're UK State-nominated victims are concerned they require no reasons to arrest or even imprison. My charge sheet against the UK Police is as follows:
- Illegal XXXX of Internet usage, telephone, home and work. (The latter included my work in a GP practise where patient records and consultations are meant to be confidential).
- XXXX The XXXX became involved in a set-up after putting my husband's home computer XXXX XXXX and whilst watching, he looked up 'venom' on Google, having an interest in many things esoteric and academic. The Northamptonshire XXXX had set up a local venom company, Venom Technologies, but changed the name to Venomtech and moved this company to Kent. This is where individuals linked to Kent XXXX and Counter-terrorism became involved in trying to artificially criminalise both my husband and myself, by trying to make a case out of a non-case.
- Wrongful XXXX and XXXX. The XXXX arrived unannounced at our home and not in uniform or in a XXXX car fishing for information without actually telling us why they were at our home and what they were actually investigating. Initially they told us it was about a company and "fraud by misrepresentation", although unwilling to tell us what the name of the company was. This then changed to "trading with a company in administration" and finally to some quasi-terrorism suggestion of trying to procure venom for use against "multiple persons". None of this made any sense to us, then or now. This amounts to constantly moving the goal-posts, presumably this variation was in line with a crime agenda they were trying to create around us.
- I asked them to invited us formally to the XXXX station for questioning and that we were not willing to talk in the garden. The XXXX then said we were aggressive (please see pictures below), ordered back up, because they were "scared" me and my husband were about to assault them, and arrested us both. This allowed them to enter the premises, something I had been unwilling to allow them to do without a proper warrant, and they then conduct a search of our home (in front of my children) during which they found nothing of consequence.
- Wrongful XXXX Prior to the XXXX interview arranged for the following day, Northamptonshire XXXX, imprisoned both myself and my husband, even though I had voluntarily attended for questioning. I was in solitary confinement during which time I was subject to repeated shouting and banging of the cell from a neighbouring inmate. This was meant to unnerve me before the XXXX interview, I was later advised. This is also XXXX under XXXX code and regulations.
- Lies told by XXXX to local Social services, in order to wrongfully seize children from caring parents: Although there was no venom in my home and my husband had not even bought any, the same XXXX officers immediately informed social services that I had venom on the premises, accessible to children and even that I was planning to INJECT my children with venom because I kept syringes in my medical bag at home.
- A meeting was held by the XXXX and social services to relay these lies, the day after the arrest! I knew nothing about this meeting and neither was I invited. However, my employer at the time who has hardly even met my family or children, was also invited to this meeting, after which he decided to suspend me from working as a GP at his practice.
- Lies told by XXXX to my employer: This initiated a complaint to the General Medical Council, the GMC the UK regulatory body for doctors. This was after the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) decided that there was no case and no charges could be brought to either myself or my husband. In fact the CPS did not even take one day to decide there was no case. As a result, the XXXX feeling slightly embarrassed at their actions, decided to try and ruin my career instead.
- Same lies forwarded to GMC by ex-employer: I have shown evidence for "XXXX" by the XXXX, especially in their attempt to involve XXXX Counter-terrorism directorate in this saga.
- The UK XXXX have made sworn witness statements to the GMC that are full of lies and holes. Even though I have supplied evidence of these lies, the GMC has chosen to ignore me repeatedly and instead take the line that the XXXX are always correct and I am labelled as "paranoid" instead.
- Continued harassment by individuals linked to the XXXX but under the cover of a XXXX Directorate in Northampton: This involved sending a private detective to question my neighbours and track me even after I had resigned from my position and left the local area. This harassment by individuals linked to the XXXX but funded using NHS public monies, and is a misuse of tax-payers money, because I had not committed any illegal acts, against the NHS or anyone else. A misuse of public office.
- Confidential information and XXXX files forwarded to individuals in the NHS and to the GMC XXXX and unethically: The Police should not have released their files to the NHS, particularly as no charge was brought against me, and this is a breach of my privacy. The NHS then tried to buttress their "case" against me by using the XXXX files, including interview XXXX and also provided XXXX release documents, marked "Restricted" to the NHS. My privacy is one thing, but to provide individuals in the NHS with details of my husband's interview and other files, considering he is not a doctor and has never worked for the NHS and is not regulated by the GMC, is a complete breach of his privacy and also suggests a malicious agenda, as outlined above.
XXXX XXXX at home and work: Note the implications of illegally watching a doctor at work for the patients who should be seen in a confidential setting.
How the UK XXXX create 'set ups' for "terrorists":
However, my main allegation against Northampton XXXX is that they used this illegally begotten information to manufacture a "set up", and in collusion with XXXX, created a company Venomtech that had previously been based in
Kettering, Northampton and was known as Venom Technologies. More to follow on this!
Kettering also the base for Northamptonshire Primary Care Trust, until relatively recently, the Trust implicated in my allegations of discrimination against me and my family. (Please see further posts below.) A week after I submitted this information to the GMC, I found myself slated and defamed in the UK Press by a reporter who had received leaked information from the NHS.
UK is a XXXX State:
We now appear to be moving into the realms of a total XXXX State in the UK, when the XXXX decide whether or not a paedophile ring is above the Law and not to be arrested. The "pleb-gate" case of a senior member of government who was recently allowed to be similarly destroyed career-wise, by a complaining Policeman, is a very good example of where this is all going, in my view.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Updated: Saturday 27th October 2012:
6+ newspapers and 7+ websites (and still counting) on my case stating defamatory material:
A further newspaper article on my case but stating more negative and libel material. I have neither met nor spoken to either journalist and neither did I send them the emails from which they quote me:
http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/64372/dereel-venom-doctor-looking-for-work/
May 15, 2012, 12:37 a.m.
The interesting points about a story about me being published in Oz, I mentioned in the last post below about the Australian GP mag. and the fact no doctors in Oz actually know of me as I have never worked or lived there as a resident, and neither do I have friends or family in Oz who may have constituted a reader-ship for any article written about me, especially in such a negative light. However, last week a local paper, 'The Courier' in Victoria, Australia, decided to public this one, six months after the original one in the UK had gone out and the others followed (see below). The headline itself is false and deceptive in calling me a "Dereel Doctor". I have never been resident in Oz or worked there as a doctor, and certainly not in Dereel, as village where I stayed in a holiday house, last year, and where I have no close friends personal or professional.
I am not disallowed from practising as a GP in the UK or abroad and could work in Oz if I chose to. I imagine this is why more defamatory material has been published AGAIN, and how these journalists managed to quote emails I never actually sent to them. The question is whether, as the article suggests, I have
JUST CAUSE to ask for POLITICAL ASYLUM from the UK??
Another interesting point, is whether the UK State, is not using the Assange (pictured below) story, to play more "occult games" regarding the seeking of political asylum from the UK for Intelligence leaks. I'll leave that one with you,
to ponder......
Updated: Saturday 27th October 2012:
When individuals in the UK NHS (National Health Service) decided to destroy my professional and personal reputation by referring me to the General Medical Council (GMC), the regulatory body for doctors, stating a conspiracy of lies, I
fought back by writing a statement to the GMC explaining the Truth, and why I felt the NHS Primary Care Trust (PCT) and my ex-employer were behaving in a malicious manner. When I referred to my Medical Defence Insurance (MDU) Cover for specialised legal assistance, an insurance that doctors in the UK are not allowed to work without, I was told I did not have the insurance and was informed that I had not paid the subscription, several months earlier. This was a lie and I believe the insurance was fraudulently removed to prevent me from having legal assistance.
As I was already registered with the Australian Medical Council (AMC) and had been offered jobs as a GP in Melbourne prior to the wrongful arrests, I decided to take up this opportunity and left the UK. By then my professional reputation had already been marred in the local area I worked in Northamptonshire, by my ex-employer and the GP Practice I had worked at,the Police and Social Services.
I had always wanted to live and work in Australia, and this was my opportunity to make the move. In posts below I have written of how we were pursued by private investigators employed by the local NHS, after I had resigned from my position as a GP and left the local area, and in fact the country. The private investigator, who specialised in "tracking", "surveillance", "GPS" etc, was paid by the NHS with tax payers money. This is a MISUSE of public funds, a malfeasance. Once, I left the UK and was in the middle of proceeding with the paperwork required for me to work in Australia, the UK doctor' regulatory body, the GMC, then contacted me and informed me there would be an "Interim Order" hearing held on the case very soon, in fact within the following few weeks. The Interim Order allows the regulatory body 18 months to investigate the allegations. The types of cases that doctors are involved, putting them under such an Interim order', have almost always been charged with a crime such as rape, child abuse/porn., murder and patient negligence. I had not committed a crime, was not charged with anything and in fact had received good reports from patients.
The GMC say they are still investigating the allegations and have made no decision as yet to what I have done wrong, having not harmed any patients and in fact been given good reports from patients. This has been going on for one year now, and attempts to go to Court have been stifled by the UK legal system.
When I received information about a hearing, I was staying in Australia, so I asked the GMC to ensure my Statement, I wrote and sent before I left the UK, against the allegations was forwarded to the hearing committee.
Initially I was informed that my statement was lost or not received, then I was told that my statement would not be submitted because it may not be "relevant" to the case. Lastly, when I contacted the Chief Executive of the GMC and informed him of this reluctance to submit my statement, I was informed by email from the GMC, that I was suffering from "Paranoid Personality Disorder" and that my 'fitness to practise' was now in question. This diagnosis was made by an administrator, not a doctor or a psychiatrist, and neither had I met anyone in the GMC to make such an assessment. The GMC was fast becoming corrupted, in my view at this stage. I even agreed to be assessed over 4 hours by two GMC psychiatrists who cleared me of any psychological impediment and said I was fit to treat and manage patients, yet the GMC still continues to say that the investigation has not yet concluded whether or not I am fit to practise as a GP.
The GMC then suspended me from practising in the UK, even though I did not attend the hearing and nor was I represented by a lawyer. This stifled my attempts to register fully in Australia and work as a doctor. I returned to the UK to clear my name last year.
I presented my case and the suspension was lifted and I was now allowed to work as a GP in the UK and also given the opportunity to continue my registering as a doctor abroad. This was also concluded in a GMC hearing on May 3rd 2012. By May 6th 2012, the 'Sunday Telegraph', a UK broadsheet, its offices based in London on Buckingham Palace Road, had written a defamatory article(link below), hence the reason for this website. You will not find this website high up on the Google search list though, as it has been pushed well out of the internet stratosphere, in favour of the negative publicity instead:
I informed the newspaper that I was registered abroad as a doctor and that even if they tried all means to prevent me from working as a doctor in the UK, the world was bigger than London. The reaction to this was to spread the defamation to Australia, first to "The Age" newspaper, a broadsheet in
Melbourne, where I intended to work, then in Australian GP magazine, aimed at doctors. This was odd, as I did not know any doctors in Australia and there would not have been any readership of people who knew me (also see post on
this below, Monday 15th October 2012):
##GP banned in UK seeking work in Australia##
http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/gp-banned-in-uk-seeking-work-in-australia
June 2012. This is very topical and I have also said that such a 'ring' (or circle) is XXXX, Social Services, NHS, doctors and the government and the Intelligence service. On the day of the wrongful arrests, the XXXX, as pictured in a post below, really a number of individuals acting within all arms of the UK Institutions, including immediately contacted Social Services. They held a meeting with the NHS and my ex-employer, without my knowledge or invitation. The XXXX the LIED that I kept venom in my home, when I never had any at all, and went onto say that there was a risk that the children would
have access to these and even went onto say that I might inject my own children with this non-existent venom. The NHS held further meetings insinuating that I might have wanted to inject "multiple persons" with venom.
Again, I stress that I did not have any venom at all and it was my husband who was looking up his research interests on the Internet. We have also alleged that the XXXX were already illegally monitoring my husband's Internet usage and especially "set up" a venom company in a game of ENTRAPMENT in order to falsely criminalise and even remove children from their parents. The XXXX, at her home, see pictures below, then arrested us for "fraud", although this didnot seem to link in with the allegations of buying venom that was advertised on
a website. When they could not charge for us a crime they then accused of us being violent and used this as an excuse to arrest us and complete a search of our home (where they found nothing of relevance), then decided to spread this defamation to Nigeria and India. I am of Indian origin These individuals within the institutions I mention, particularly the NHS and Police, and it quite likely that the defamers in this were concerned I may return to India and decide to work there. The Google search synopsis makes reference to "India Criminal Records":
Google:
This is why I believe Nigeria should build her own world class health system why Nigerian doctors and researchers can work with freehand.
Rapinder Adekola | Medical License Verification
medicallicenseverification.com/tag/rapinder-adekola/8 May 2012 – Dr Rapinder Adekola and her husband James planned to research the ...India Criminal Records A site dedicated to providing the public with ...
This defamation also not enough for the UK State . As my husband was born in Nigeria, and lived in Lagos, this information was then passed to The Guardian newspaper, a broadsheet based in Lagos. The 'Sunday Telegraph' article was place on their website a a blog. The Nigerian bloggers, unlike the Australians,
were not as impressed by the article though, and called it racist. http://www.nairaland.com/beaf/posts/121
The same English article was also placed in another Nigerian newspaper called, "Nation News":
http://www.nairapark.com/forum/index.php?topic=23676.0&t=nigeria-news-the-nation-news-doctor-in-trouble-for-trying-to-buy-scorpion-venom-with
These are the comments made by Nigerians on the blog:
m On May 07 |
This is an outrageous level of crap that must be very stiffly resisted by all Nigerians. Imagine the NHS excuse they gave... That they would treat their kids with their research results! Are they diviners or prophets? Its just pathetic, wicked and construed. I can assure you that it was done to block a Nigerian and his Indian wife from making progress in an area some white prof with connections is interested in. Its a dog eat dog World out there and we must not allow our own to be swallowed in a foreign land. |
I can understand the need to protect patients and children, but this seems pretty harsh. I wonder why the Dr. is not fighting a legal battle though, like she just gave up and moved away. must be frustrating for her. |
Regarding the last blog above "Kilode?!" roughly translates as "WTF"??
I have an English lawyer who appears to stifle every attempt I make to go to Court and am unable to find any other lawyer who will take the case, especially under legal aid (legal aid means the government pays the fees because I am
unemployed and unable to afford private legal assistance).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated: Monday 15th October 2012:
I have just recently been informed by an Australian working in the Australian health care industry that I made it to the front page of the doctors' magazine, 'Australian GP'. WOW!!
Headline:
http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/gp-banned-in-uk-seeking-work-in-australia
This is not good news for me, really because this article is taken from the libellous Sunday Telegraph article, I have already mentioned, and one of the reasons why I started this website, in order to give my side of the story. See link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9248068/Doctor-struck-off-after-trying-to-buy-lethal-scorpion-and-spider-venom.html
The headline stated:
by Ben Leach, Sunday Telegraph 6th May 2012
As I explained, after the UK media and the NHS attempted to trash my personal and professional reputation, in my opinion, on the behest of the UK State, they appear to have contacted the Australian media, and I believe they would have similarly contacted any other country's media had I decided to go there and work as a doctor.
The Australian GP article was taken from the same document making malicious allegations by my ex-employer to the local NHS department.
In both these articles, no attempt was made to be balanced or fair and neither did I meet with or speak with either of the journalists who wrote them, thereby acting unethically by publishing it.
Again, I will add that I am not "banned" from working as a doctor in the UK and neither did I have any venom in my home, or have ever had access to venom.
Once it was seen I had been to Australia and been offered employment there, someone from the UK, possible the media, appeared to have taken the initiative to contact the main newspaper in Melbourne, 'The Age' as well as the Australian GP magazine (see link below).
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/venom-doctor-seeks-victorian-job-20120515-1ynlp.html
Neither journalist spoke to me or met with me and have taken information straight from the UK media's article in the Telegraph. As I have already stated: In the UK, taking action for libel requires financial backing and a willing lawyer.
Plus I am not resident in Australia and have never been but hopefully, as some stage will be in a position to take action against the magazine 'Australian GP' for libel and defamation. WATCH THIS SPACE!
Why are these individuals in the UK/Australia going to this extent?
This is a question that needs to be considered. Lets look at the facts:
- I have never worked in Australia, having visited there once, just last year for the first time.
- I have no doctor friends who live or work in Oz and do not have any relatives residing there either.
- By writing an article about me in the Australian GP suggests there is a readership who actually know me and care to know about me.
This was just not the case.
The only rational reason I can think of for all this effort, is to muddy my professional reputation, perhaps in an attempt to prevent me from gaining any employment in Australia. This seems extraordinarily malicious as the UK media had already tried to achieve the same objective in the UK.
You cannot know the extent the UK media can, and will, go to RUIN your life, until you are in the unfortunate position of coming across them. Hence, why many celebs choose not to live here!
The UK XXXX and the media allege I was aggressive to them: Not only that. They also say that Mr Adekola was potentially violent during their 10 minutes 'fishing expedition' to our home. Why not take a look at the photos
below, taken by me (clearly during the time I was not, allegedly, about to assault the female PO) and judge for yourself.............??
THE PHOTOS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FOR LEGAL REASONS
NOTE: No XXXX car, no uniform, no advanced warning of attendance, no search warrant, but demanding entry to home.
This photo above, shows the 2 Northamptonshire xxxx officers, who now state they were from xxx who visited my home last year. The female, who now says she was scared I was about to XXXX her, is seen sitting in the car, close up below, smiling. The male is having a conversation with Mr Adekola and does not appear to be troubled by imminent violence.
Neither were any charges brought against us. We did not allow the xxxx officers in our home without a reason for them being there, and this they refused to give us. They also refused to produce a search warrant and proceeded to arrest us 'wrongfully' just so they could gain entry to the property.
After the searched our home they found nothing but caused considerable trauma to our 2 young children, yet the UK media, and now Australian media, states that my children were at risk from us rather than from them, the xxxx.
"SHOCKING" picture of an "aggressive" black man speaking to the xxxx in the grounds of his own home:
After being unable to charge me with any crime or even any potential crime, the UK xxxx, in particular, the female XXXX officer pictured above, appeared to have taken the initiative of informing my employer that I was "aggressive" and a risk to my own children. This had the effect of causing a referral to the
GMC and all the debris associated with this bombshell.
This is an accurate description of UK JUSTICE upfront and I believe also a description of what other citizens face but cannot speak or say for fear of the XXXX and generally of the State itself!
However, we will not be relying on the UK State to achieve any legal remedy or Justice, on our behalf. I am a firm believer in Karma and the concept of "what goes around, comes around". Anyone who doesn't share this belief is lacking knowledge, in my opinion.
This is NATURAL JUSTICE and relies on the forces of nature and the natural balance of the world.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated: Friday 5th October 2012:
I have been asked why I believe the British Home Office, in particular their Immigration and Nationality Directorate are involved in this "Institutional Assault" against me and my family, and why I think their employees, civil servants and Military Intelligence (M.I.) personnel had purposely "infiltrated" the NHS and GP practices where I previously worked. I must point out that I was born in England, my Indian grandfather having first
lived in the UK in the 1950's, and was schooled and brought up here. My husband, who was born in Nigeria, has also lived in the UK for many years. Both my children were born and have lived in the UK.
IDENTITY FRAUD and ILLEGAL DEPORTATION
So why the connection? My allegations to the UK State, concern IDENTITY FRAUD and ILLEGAL DEPORTATION. This first came to light post 9/11, when EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION came into being. In my opinion, this evil practice allowed many innocent men, also from the UK, to what amounts to STATE-SANCTIONED kidnapping and illegally deporting to Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
I believe this involved the changing of the identities of these individuals including ceasing of passport and even changing their religion to Islam in order to further perpetuate the 9/11 lie.
Back home in the UK, another coincidence now plagues my life: A new next door neighbour recently told me he is a Home Office Immigration Lawyer from London!
This brings me back to the "organised" institutional assault in the UK, and why neighbour's are never what they seem. The CRYPTO-FACIST State's Big Brother, ensures it is omni-present in every sphere of the victim's life, including home and work, from postal service to communications to education and in housing.
More to follow on this point and why I half-jokingly call this: "spooks@work.com"
Updated: Tuesday 2nd October 2012:
Since refusing to complete and sign the form that would have allowed me to "voluntary relinquish" (cancel) my membership with the GMC (see update below), another hearing appears to have been hastily convened, and without adequate notice being served. I also pointed out to the GMC last week, that if the "investigation" into my case had been completed in February 2012, why was I being kept on an 'Interim Order'- a GMC order reserved for doctors who have been charged with crimes such as murder, rape and child abuse, or have been
wilfully negligent towards their patients.
This sudden turnaround may also be due to the publicity-thanks to all your support.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated: Friday 28th September 2012:
How a UK professional regulatory body, now renamed 'Directorate' asked me for permission to breach Data Protection and privacy laws, using techniques akin to blackmail and extortion: The General Medical Council, the GMC, is the doctors' professional body in the UK, and requires all doctors who are practising, that is working as doctors and treating patients, to be registered with them. I first registered with the GMC almost 20 years ago, when I graduated from medical school and paid a fee to do so. Since then, I have paid this fee annually and only recently had to become more involved with the GMC given a case was made against me. Whilst I was abroad in Australia, the GMC held a hearing without my being present or represented and proceeded to suspend me from practising as a GP, at the same time, causing problems with my registration in Australia.
Due to the costs of the GMC registration fees and the fact I am not practising as GP at the moment, I recently asked for a "voluntary relinquishing" of my name from the GMC register and therefore, my membership of the GMC. I had previously, on a couple of occasions had cause to 'relinquish' or cancel my
membership temporarily with the GMC. This required a simple telephone call or email to their 'registration department'. A short form of only a few questions, that included my name and address, was completed and returned to them.
When I later returned from my travels and started practising in the UK again, I simply contacted the GMC who simply asked for the fees payment and immediately re-entered my name on the GMC register. This allowed any prospective employer to employ me once they had checked that I was registered as a working doctor.
However, this year, the year of my case against the GMC, the UK XXXX, Social Services and my ex-employer, I asked for the same form in order to cancel my membership. I was sent a form that defies all Privacy Laws and Data Protection
and reads rather like a Home Office Immigration and Nationality Directorate form for an asylum seeker. The declaration, is more akin to a "security clearance" Act, rather than any form used by professional regulatory body.
Further details about this form to follow next week in the next update.
REMEMBER: "Once one person's human rights are grossly affected, is when everyone's rights are affected". This starts as a philosophical idea but slowly filters down into everyone's reality.
You only have to look around you and see how the UK Big Brother era now affects every citizen's human rights to privacy, and not just the few victims in the GOLDFISH BOWL of the State's intelligence game.
Updated: Thursday 27th September 2012: I have added some missed points to yesterday's update if you care to read it again, below.
Updated: Wednesday 26th September 2012: Welcome back and welcome if you are new to this site.
I have spoken about the activities of an NHS department local to where I worked as a doctor in Brackley) and General Practitioner (GP) for several years. This NHS department changed its name from 'Public Health department' to 'Public Health Directorate' shortly after I started working there. For readers in the US, the equivalent of this department would be "US Centre for Disease Control". This also beggars the question why this particular NHS department was involved in my life at all, as I was merely working as a GP (family doctor) in a small semi-rural practice in the UK.
The activities of the doctors and other employees in this public health department, with whom I was not employed, created a case against me as a professional and a doctor, that ultimately was meant to prevent me from working as a doctor as well as to sully and blacken my personal and professional reputation. The case was based on a fabrication and a web of lies, with the input of a female doctor I worked with, who also started working at
this practice just after I started working there. I have alleged (below) that both this doctor and the individuals at the local NHS department, also a female doctor, were involved, I allege, in organising an "institutional assault" (see previous updates, below) on both myself and my family, that includes young
children. I have also accused these individuals of being linked or a part of the UK Military Intelligence and/or UK Police community. This is an important point as it describes why an NHS department would change their name to 'directorate' and
why their activities were well out with that expected for doctors and NHS employees.
This female doctor, also foreign who started working at the practice at the same time as me and who, I allege fabricated evidence in order to conjure up a case against me, was involved in Intelligence "games", that is, occult practises and activities that are secretly meant to harm an individual. The description
"game" such as "great game" is a misnomer, because the victim of the 'assault' is usually ambushed and is has no knowledge of what is secretly being done around him/herself. It is not a 'level playing field' type of 'game',
but uses bullying tactics and thought control to affect the victim's psychology and to eventually cause harm.
This is part of an institutional assault that also makes up the SECRETS I speak of within the British system. In essence, it is this system controlled by the Intelligence services, that uses minds individual mind control to cause mass mind control, thereby having the power to effect 'events' (such as false flags).This allows the maintenance of a system that is essentially an under-hand facist regime.
I have jokingly said on Twitter that Wiki-leaks should really be re-named Wiccan-leaks so that we can all understand more clearly why the Intelligence community is so against such secrets being exposed to the public and why Assange has been so reviled by the British establishment. The great thing about the Internet is that we can use it as a massive encylopaedia:
If you look up "Directorate" on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directorate
.....you will see that there are historical connotations with intelligence services across the world, including the CIA, Securitate of the Eastern Block and the Stasi police of war Germany. The naming of a department as a 'directorate' suggests a powerful body answerable only to the Minister of the department and ultimately the Head of State, the Prime Minster. Therefore, the re-naming of a department outside these examples, to directorate, such as the, UK National Health Service (NHS), is, in my opinion, highly unusual. The NHS is answerable to a Chief Executive for each local body, and not a Director General. In addition, shortly after I started working at this practice the same local NHS body, allowed the PROBATION SERVICE to work from the health centre. This means an arm of the Criminal Justice system was now working in a GP health centre and included clients of the probation service being allowed to wait and be seen in the same corridor I was working as a doctor and seeing patients who were consulting me for health advice. You wouldn't put a doctors' service in a police station or a dentist in a Fire
department, so why put the probation service in a doctors' practice?? This breaks all guidelines on functional separation and is an anomaly neither the local NHS department who has since tried to prevent me from working as a doctor, the doctors' practice I worked at that allowed the probation service into the health centre, or the GMC, the UK regulatory body, have been able to answer why these guidelines were breached at this particular practice.
This has never been seen before or since in any health centre across the UK.
CRYPTO-FACISM: The State's use of necromancy (use of spirits) in the pursuance of a facist agenda.
The doctor, who is not a UK national, and who started at the practice at the same time as me and, I believe from my several years experience, was very au fait with intelligence and occult practices used by them, and the type of routine used against victims they target. This doctor, also regulated by the GMC used intelligence occult practises to harm me and my family. I allege she has strong links with the UK Intelligence service and MI6. Similarly, I believe the actions of the other individuals in the
local PCT, also UK doctors, and who maliciously fabricated this case against me, were acting, and could only have been acting, as those closely connected with the intelligence service, the military or the Police, and were acting on the orders of their Director General and ultimately the UK State itself. The question is, why would the UK State go to these lengths to destroy one individual and her family? The State's answer to my allegations was to label me as paranoid and ask me to see a psychiatrist! (more about this in previous updates below). This is a typical response by the State to anyone who challenges them and my case this also gave the State more reason to try and
label me as insane. As seen by the updates below, I have alleged that the State was also motivated to try and remove my children from my care, on very spurious grounds and again, based on a web of lies from all the institutions involved.
Last updated: 28th June 2012
Sunday Telegraph 'leak' by Northamptonshire (UK) NHS and leak across three continents. Is this MALICE AFORETHOUGHT or my "paranoia"
The modern day NAZIS: Alive and kicking in the UK today!
I have given the link earlier for the defamatory article printed in the UK press on 6th May 2012, about me and my family (see Home page). At the same time information, also containing falsehoods, was leaked to the UK press, a reporter from 'The Age' newspaper, a pretty major newspaper in Melbourne, Australia, also contacted me about the same Telegraph story. I was informed by this reporter that if I refused to speak to him he would bear no bones about printing the same information given in the Sunday Telegraph newspaper.
The 'coincidence' is that I was already registered with the Australian Medical Council (AMC) and in fact, had been given an offer of employment in Melbourne.
It appeared to me that the same person/s who, out of pure malice, leaked information to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper, had also decided to blacken my name in Melbourne- just in case I decided to work there. Shortly thereafter I received a further correspondence from a journalist of the Australian GP magazine, a free production, received by GPs in Australia.
I have already described below, how the General Medical Council (GMC), the UK doctors' regulatory body, scuppered my attempts at taking up the employment in Melbourne, wrongly and without reason or fact. This was inAugust last year, 2011. Since then, the same organisation, the GMC has tried byall means to scupper my attempts to take the matter to the UK judiciary and to the High Court.
This has not been helped by a lawyer who appears, by all intents and purposes, to be entrenched in the British System, (also see below, my upcoming book, "An Institutional Assault: The Secret Shame of the British System"), and unable to move forward without feeling intimidated, coerced or even threatened.
Of course, regarding the press releases and the defamation of my professional and personal character I quickly realised what was going on: I informed the reporters that I was registered with other medical bodies in the developing world, my husband, Mr Adekola, being a Nigerian national. The next day, on entering my name into Google, I found that the main Nigerian national broadsheet newspaper, 'The Guardian' had also printed the story on their website (Naira Park) and even more puzzling, the Indian Criminal Bureau website had been given details of the story and case. That's despite the fact I am not a criminal or a fugitive and have not committed a crime in any country. That's the press in the UK, Australia, Africa and Asia- more or less across the world! The salient point is that neither the Swedish, Brazilian or Russian, for example, press were informed. Nigeria is my husband's home country, India is my ancestral country but the UK my birth and home country. Lastly, Australia is the place I was planning to emigrate to with my family. The countries to which this defamatory information was given are the places I could possibly have been seen to emigrate to and/or seek employment from!
I have been told that all this is a "coincidence" and a product of 'paranoia'. What I would like to ask the UK State is whether they think I was born yesterday or, more pertinent still, whether they are in such a state of self deception that they don't realise they are the equivalent of the MODERN DAY NAZIS.
I cannot tolerate the actions of wicked men and will continue to speak about my experiences. As yet I have only covered the tip of the iceberg, in relation to the secret shames of the British State and their intelligence services........
Updated: Monday 1st October 2012:
This update is a continuation of last week's up-date and will reveal the GMC form that as sent to me in order for me to cancel my membership of this organisation temporarily, whilst not working as a doctor. This is called "voluntary relinquishing of membership" by the GMC. I have since been informed by the GMC registration department (recently renamed "directorate"- see up-dates below) that if I do not complete this form I will be liable to fees and that if I don't these fees I will be continually sent reminders. Indeed, I have been bombarded with reminders especially since I refused to complete the form and complained about being asked to sign the declaration on this from, akin to an underhand way of achieving "security clearance". By asking me to sign a declaration I don't agree to on an inappropriate form that doesn't make sense in the context of simply cancelling one's membership of an organisation, is bad enough, but to threaten with fees that I can't afford, is akin to using blackmail and extortion. The only organisations that refuse simple cancelling of membership in this way, are CRIMINAL ones such as the mafia. The lengthy form states the following:
Section 8. Final Declaration
Please note
- The (General Medical Council) GMC reserves the right to make any enquiries that is considers appropriate to establish your fitness to practise
- Such enquiries may involve the transfer of your personal data outside the European Economic Area. Such personal data may include, but may not be restricted to, your name, date of birth and qualification details.
- Your personal data may be given to your referees, government bodies and other third bodies as may be reasonably necessary
- To protect the public, the GMC may share your registration and licensing information with UK and international regulators, public litigation and prosecution bodies and law enforcement organisations.
The GMC has no jurisdiction to regulate doctors beyond the UK, just as the UK Police has no jurisdiction outside the UK. I am in the process of making a Court case against the Police.
In fact, the GMC would need to seek approval through bilateral treaties with other countries or with the European Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN) in order to extend this authority to outside the UK.
Other less obvious parts of the form that make it unusually inappropriate in this context are the following points:
- Rather similar to Home Office directorate forms it is marked with a serial number at the top of the form, unlike the GMC forms previously completed.
- The declaration asks me to "sign your signature so that it matches the signature on your passport or identity card". Also, we do not have identity cards in the UK.
- The front of this form informs me that, "the information you give on this form will be used by the GMC to compile statistics and undergo research". In stating this my consent has not been asked for.
- Other questions are very similar to theses found in the Police Criminal Bureau check form, but included questions about traffic related offences. I did not have to answer such questions to register with the GMC so why now to DE-register?
At the least this form treats me like a wanted criminal or even a fugitive, not a doctor who wishes to stop practising in the UK. The worst scenario is that it is an underhand way for the State, via the GMC, to keep surveillance on me, including Police surveillance (see Paragraph 4), even if I am living and working
outside the UK. I have already alleged that the GMC were involved in preventing me from working in Australia. This form now asks for, not only information, about my referees, that is ex-employers and doctors who are willing to vouch for me by
writing a good reference on my behalf, can be contacted by the GMC and information about me divulged to them. Since the case against me has been based on lies and fabricated evidence, I can't imagine that the GMC, who I am currently wanting to take to Court, is willing to give any positive feedback about me to my referees!! Hence, the form suggests I should give my consent for the GMC to further ruin my personal and professional reputation to any previous employers who are actually willing to vouch for me as a doctor and a person.
..and that's the reason why you should always read the small print and the large print before you are tricked into signing away your rights to privacy.
In the meantime, it appears as if the UK State and the UK Judicial system, in this case,will continue to spout lies, break laws, corrupt it's system to such a degree, until the State itself is completely eaten up from the inside, and all by it's own hands.
If you have any comments on this you can email me or get me on Twitter-I'd be happy for your feedback.
Last updated: 21st June 2012
Human Right to Privacy and Illegal accessing of data pertaining to my medical records
(by NHS PCT Public Health department doctors
For those just joining me on this site, I have been describing my case against the General Medical Council (GMC), the UK doctors regulatory body below, and how the actions of the UK State, I have alleged are a breach of the Human Rights of my family, as well as myself.
Last year, in August 2011, the GMC held a hearing without my being present or having representation. I was suspended from practising as a General Practitioner in the UK, although no findings of fact had been made. In fact, this situation remains and still no findings of fact have been made, and although I have been allowed to practise as a doctor in the UK, the conditions under which I have been placed, make it difficult for me to get a suitable position.
At the point my excellent legal team were on the verge of taking the GMC to Court for these conditions, one of which was a clear Human Rights Breach, see in blue below, the GMC removed this particular condition:
a.You must register with and remain under the care of a
general practitioner and inform him/her that you are subject to
investigation under the GMC Fitness to Practise procedures,
and of these conditions;
b.
You must inform the GMC of the name and contact
details of your general practitioner and any other medical
practitioner responsible for your care;
c.
You must allow the GMC to exchange information
about your health, (and any treatment you are receiving), with
your general practitioner and any other medical practitioner
responsible for your care, including your occupational health
practitioner(s). For the purposes of this determination, these
practitioners are the person(s) referred to in conditions (9), (10)
In essence, this meant any time I saw my own doctor, or a hospital doctor, or to my surprise, any health practitioner, including a dentist, optitian or chiropodist, I would be compelled to inform the GMC of such a visit, and the GMC are saying (c.), that they would then be allowed to ask any one I saw about my health the details of the consultation.
Anyone, by any chance, mention Kafka, the Stasi or the UK State?
As I was, or am not ill, have no need to see a doctor and have not been diagnosed with any illness, why was the GMC imposing such a draconian condition on me, just to allow me to work as a GP and earn a living to support my family, that includes young children?
I have already said, how a GMC administrator and the lawyer for the accusing party, Northamptonshire NHS, had, without meeting me and without any medical expertise, diagnosed me as having a psychiatric condition, Paranoid Personality Disorder. This diagnosis was bandied about like the truth of the bible all because I wrote and sent a statement in defence of the accusers' allegations. I have since coined the phrase gagging diagnosis, in relation to this, as opposed to a gagging order. The former does not need a judge's decision to be made in a Court of Law unlike the latter, and apparently can even be made without going to medical school or becoming a specialist in the field of Psychiatry.
I underwent 2 psychiatric assessments by two very experienced UK psychiatrists, lasting almost 5 hours in total, with no psychiatric diagnoses to come out of it. Why then, did the GMC think it correct, ethical and legal to impose a condition that was a clear breach of my human right to receive medical treatment and advice confidentially.
The threat of Court action did deter the GMC from continuing with this condition. At the moment the GMC are acting like a quasi judicial body, holding a charade of a "kangaroo Court", when they are only empowered to act as a regulatory body. Their attempts to modify their process, that has been around for 150 years, to a quasi military-esque tribunal, has also been described below.
I believe the reason the GMC, and the UK State, has deterred even my legal team from taking the matter to a UK Court, is because, many of the allegations made against me by doctors as well as others, untruthfully and unrthically, would be tested under oath. Honestly, I don't really have much faith in the UK judicial system as a whole.
The reason the GMC cannot make any "findings of fact", and appear determined to continue with their 'investigation' until 2013, is because there are no facts against me, except those fabricated by a malicious system determined to destroy an individual and her family.
An Institutional Assault: The Secret Shame of the British System the title of my upcoming book that will be available for FREE on the Inernet.
The 'Interim Order' that the GMC continues with, where an investigation has been ongoing for almost one year and no findings of fact have been made', is an order reserved mostly for doctors who have been charged and/or convicted of a crime such as murder, rape, child sex abuse etc. I have not been charged or criminalised and have done nothing wrong..
Last updated: 18th June 2012
Right to Privacy and Surveillance of 'Micro-targets' by UK government
If you are familar with my case already having read the first and most recent posts, you will know that, on this website, I have accused Northamptonshire Public Health Directorate of having a direct or indirect involvement with the UK Police and Military, in their harassment of me and my family.
To give you soem background on what a public health doctor is in the UK; they do not work in clinical practice, that is, they do not see or care for patients, and in my opinion are the administrators of the medical profession. In essence, the bureaucrats.
In fact, to become a public health doctor requires the minimum of clinical training. 'Directorate', a term not used by the UK health service often (or one that I personally have never heard of) and preferred by the police, was the name by which this particular NHS public health department in Northamptonshire, preferred to be known as. The doctors working in this 'directorate', whom I had never met, and with whom I shared no working contract with, I continue to accuse of leading a campaign of harassment against me and my family.
This harassment was well co-ordinated, as described below as an 'institutional assault', and included the collusion of individuals employed and placed in other institutions, including the local Police, doctors at the private (not NHS) practice I was previously employed at, the local social services authority who attempted to place my children in care unnecessarily (see UK care system below) and the children's school.
Recently, this harassment culminated in my being referred to the the GMC (General Medical Council, the UK regulatory body for doctors), as well as Northamptonshire NHS forwarding information onto a Sunday Telegraph news reporter. This information was also forwarded to a news reporter at 'The Age' newpaper in Melbourne Australia, where the Northamptonshire NHS Public health department had tracked me to, thanks to their deployment of a Private Investigator, paid for by NHS funds- a malfeasence.
The GMC had already scuppered my attempts to take up employment in Australia.
Sue for libel! So my friends in the US advise me regarding the newspaper article...
In fact, I have been informed that, unlike the US, this was not the opportunity for me to make some mega-bucks. Defamation of character, I have been told by a UK libel lawyer, is a luxury reserved for the rich and famous, and at this present moment I am neither of these.
In fact, my medical insurance that I paid and was covered for £10 million, I have alleged, was illegally withdrawn by the Medical Defence Union (MDU), in London.
Harassment by Northamptonshire NHS Trust
This harassment continued even after I had resigned from the medical practice in Brackley, UK, and moved away from the area with my family: These doctors at the Public health Directorate, illegally and unethically accessed data pertaining not only to my medical records but also those of my child (see first post below).
After my alleged "false" arrest, buy the local XXXX last year, I accused the same officers of ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE. The doctors at Northamptonshire NHS decided this was a "bizarre" accusation and said I was "paranoid" in their referral to the GMC. This was despite the fact I had never met these doctors and that my experiences did point to surveillance. Given that these doctors did not have all the information, their defence of the XXXX, and characterisation of me, was unusual, unprofessional and irrational unless there was a vendetta.
Twitter account and this website opened one month ago
Since joining the world of Twitter, a popular social networking site, a month ago, and publicising my case on this website, another test case or precedent has been set concerning a Tory MP and a Northamptonshire resident (another coincidence, the place?) she accused of being a 'troll', or an Internet bully. I wrote at the time (see Opinion page) that I felt there was an agenda here for increased Internet snooping.
When 'lo and behold', just the other day, the UK Home secretary, Theresa May has announced plans to do just, especially looking at Tweets (messages sent on Twitter) that and especially to pick on certain individuals, a term called "targeting". Questions to consider is exactly what criteria would be used to decide who to target? Would the person be informed that they are under surveillance? Would a warrant be needed for a 'communications intercept'? Could such targets be now exposed to CYBER-BULLYING from TROLL leader, Theresa May and her government?? Something akin to the Stasi, perhaps.
Karma:
If you read the 'Background page' and my description of the Channel 4 film, 'Bhaji on the Beach', it's clear that I had been under surveillance at that time for this film to be made and for my conversations to have been used in the script. This was 20 years ago. As a microcosm, both myself and my family have experienced the workings of a Police state around us. However, I have steadily, over the years seen this microcosm spilling out onto the general community. One only has to look at the number of CCTV cameras on every corner. If you have travelled enough, you may even note that nowhere else in the world has this level of camera surveillance on the streets. Now it's not just me, as the microcosm has become a macrocosm and everyone can live under a similar kind of Big Brother scrutiny.
Philosophically, it makes complete sense. if a populace, can pretend to 'see no evil and hear no evil' and allow, or be involved the harassment of just one individual, one innocent individual who is disallowed from having any civil liberties, then slowly you all strip yourselves of the same. This was the 'Shush!' UK culture, to coin a phrase, whereby as long as everyone kept quiet and did not support the victims in anyway, including to turn them into social pariahs, to be ignored, no-one would know any better and the 'secret was safe' with the UK populace.
This is akin to the grooming of a child victim by an abuser, and is the why I call this institutional assault a "secret shame".
The debate is not whether or not the UK has descended into a Police state, but how long it will take for the UK to descend into totalitarianism and the more overt rule of the military. The clock is ticking........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last updated: 14th June 2012
Children's Human Rights to privacy and right to family life
Lola, Baroness Young @LolaHornsey, recently tweeted: "Met w/NSPCC re awful plight of children in care now numbering 90,000 in the UK. Why has this happened & what govt going to do about it?"
However, I can only speak of my personal experience of the UK local authorities and individuals, who as the employees of these institutions purported to care for children but, in my view, were only interested in splitting up my family and putting my children in care or constantly threatening to take this action. The latter, of course causing considerable distress and psychological trauma as you would expect. When I tried to oppose the UK social services in this action, the local NHS became involved, wrongly because I was neither employed by them nor had offered them any confidential information they got hold of. Doctors in the local NHS Trust, continued to also intimidate via a constant stream of threatening letters because I opposed the social services involvement in wanting to monitor my children and family- or in their terms, put them under Child surveillance.
I have since been told by the GMC (General Medical Council and regulatory body for doctors in the UK) that I "do not cooperate with authority" . This now a reason to stop me from practising as a GP!?
J'ACCUSE: If the UK State were a parent, judging by the statistics and the number of kids abused in care, including sexually abused, it would have care responsibility taken away from them. I believe, especially in my family's case, that individuals in placements in authoritarian institutions such as the Police, the Children's social services, schools and in my case, individuals posing as NHS employees, even doctors, and in relation to my work as a doctor, were/are involved in an alleged large UK #paedophile ring, coordinated to target certain children or children of certain parents.
I have already alleged that such a paedophile ring is probably behind the recent News of the World scandal, that includes the Police, MPs and journalists. I wonder whether the media writes the news or CREATES the news?
Perhaps this is just another conspiracy theory. Well, let me tell you about my personal experience of how lies were told about my family in order to gain access to my children to carry out an "assessment" by social workers in the UK:
I have already mentioned the false allegations about my having venom and using it for researach, and how this information was falsely used in writing a defamatory news article about me and my family. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9248068/Doctor-struck-off-after-trying-to-buy-lethal-scorpion-and-spider-venom.html
The interest in my children, who are of mixed race (half Indian and half African) was sinister.
When the social worker attended my home, thereby breaching my privacy, and assessed my children, thereby breaching the privacy of my children, I asked her why the XXXX had asked her to attend. She replied that a "crime had been committed". FALSE. I was never criminalised/charged and I was never a fugitive when I later left the UK to live in Australia. (see first post below)
However, this did not stop the local NHS Trust from employing a Private Investigator to "track" where I had gone- as if this was any of their business, as I had resigned from my job and left the local area. When I accused of the NHS of misusing public funds to harass me and my family, a defamatory article appeared in the Sunday newspapers. The NHS employee, paid by the NHS, continued her "investigation". Even though she was not a social worker or a police woman she went to talk to my children's school and managed to find out that the children had told their teacher they were moving house. A breach of their right to privacy.
Even though I informed the school that we had moved from the area, the school decided the children had "disappeared", labelled them as "missing" and informed the local authority. It was as if I was disallowed from taking my own children overseas. the level of collusion between the different authorities and institutions is baffling if you do not understand the British system and the evil it is capable of and in fact survives on.
This was not the end of this maliciousness. The local NHS doctors then decided to label me a child abuser and informed a branch of the Home Office (a government office) that I was not fit to practise as a GP because I should not be working with children or vulnerable adults. I have asked this institution, that deals with the employment of convicted paedophiles mainly, to reveal what type of child abuse I am guilty of but they have declined to reply.
I have accused the referring doctors, including my previous employer, of unethical behaviours in this respect, and of passing on confidential and wrong information to a government office in order to prevent me from practising as a GP. In fact this is enough to have these doctors referred to the regulatory body, the GMC, for unethical conduct. Unfortunately, the GMC does not appear to be so conerned about this and at one hearing the GMC Chairperson referred to their conduct as " misbehaviour" that was irrelevant to the hearing and to my case.
Institutions in the West, even since the times of colonialism, have been documented as removing children from the parents of indigenous people, and I feel this is part of conquering the area and taking the land that did not belong to them.
I hope I have made you aware of how the UK institutions can work against certain targeted people so take care and God Bless!
Human Right: Right not to be held responsible for the actions of another or for the actions of one's spouse.
LAW: The difference between action and intention. One cannot be charged for a belief.
Accusation of HERESY in the 21st century?
Punishment akin to the Spanish INQUISITION:
I have been accused of 'unconventional' research and beliefs in alternative remedies. I have explained to the doctors' regulatory body, the GMC (General Medical Council), that I was not doing any research and that I did not have access to any insect venom. I have described in detail how my husband, Mr Adekola, did have an interest in research, from his professional stance in software, and in addition that he is a hobbyist and has some interests that others might find eccentric. I have also explained how neither myself nor Mr Adekola had any access to venom. More importantly, I never subjected my patients or any other persons to any (alleged) unorthodox beliefs and have practsed medicine as a GP who graduated from a Western or UK medical school.
All this has fallen on deaf ears. It does not matter what I say, it appears that the British system is determined to take me through some thinly veiled Court process and to treat me like a criminal (see first post below about my being "tracked" by the NHS). This process is rapidly changing into a tribunal system, akin to the military system.
The word HERESY IS DEFINED AS "A belief or practise contrary to the orthodox doctrine". It is as if I am being accused of a MEDICAL HERESY- in the 21st century! In fact, I would go as far as to say that I am not even being accused of practising a heresy but of "BELIEVING in a (medical) heresy".
During the Spanish inquisition, the Vatican ordered the well known torture of non-believers, sometimes for made up crimes, until they CONFESSED to a sin. Often, they were kept in isolated cells indefinitely, or even burnt alive.
As I said, nothing I say in defence of the allegations makes any difference to the ones judging me at the GMC, thereby subjecting me to an INQUISITION.
This also reminds me of the innocents sitting in Guantanamo Bay, courtesy of the US state.
Last updated: 11th June 2012
A point I forgot to mention below, regarding the GMC (General Medical Council)and an apparent change to their time honoured method of regulating doctors. News yesterday that instead of holding a hearing to discuss the referred doctor's fitness to practise as a doctor, the GMC was going to create a TRIBUNAL scenario, and instead of doctors regulating doctors, a retired High Court judge would decide on the difficult decision of allowing a doctor to work ornot. I also mentioned that there does not appear to have been any consultation with UK doctors at all and this news appeared to come out of nowhere. I also stated the rather pertinent coincidence with my own situation, having been referred to the GMC myself (wrongly, in my view), and the fact 5that this was the second major change the GMC had made to it's rules/regulations, over the last 6 months. The GMC was established 150 years.
Mr Adekola tells me he accessed the BBC website. from where this news emanated yesterday morning, to leave a comment, being an avid commenter and blogger. There were no comments left under the GMC news story and in addition, neither was Mr Adekola able to levae a comment himself.
Further news this morning that the GMC has ALREADY held it's first tribunal. I have already described my accusations that individuals in the UK military and Police have placed themselves in Institutions in order to harass and persecute me and my family.
The first tribunal concerns a military doctor adn his fitness to practise after being involved in the examination at death of an Iraqi, apparently beaten by servicemen. This is mixing the UK Court martial system with the GMC, a doctors' regulatory body. Perhaps the whole case should have been subject to only a military tribunal, but the point is that after setting up this new system today, the GMC chose the first case to concern a serviceman of the UK military.
Honestly, I think this is also another 'spoiler', but I await to see how this unravels. This pseudo-High Court scenario strikes me as also a means of artificially criminalising a doctor ('fit ups' also described below).
No other profession in the UK is regulated in this way, outside of the military who both employes and regulates. Also news that Financial Regulatory Authority (FSA), another regulator, is to change it's name, but also the new head of it is a member of the territorial army!
This is another step towards UK becoming a totalitarian state, in my opinion.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last updated: 6th June 2012
How I was denied adequate medical care during childbirth by UK midwives, even though I was a UK citizen and a doctor: I have spoken about my work as a General Practitioner at a UK medical practice where I was subtly and occult victimised and abused by the staff who worked with me, including the doctors and other healthcare worker colleagues (see below under 12th May 2012 update, An Institutional Assault: The Secret Shame of the British System).
This alleged treatment and my ongoing legal case was one of the reasons I started this website. However, the complete dehumanising of myself and my family extended outside this workplace and even to my medical health and my medical health when in one of the most vulnerable positions possible- during childbirth.
Shortly after I began employment at the health centre (named below) I took maternity leave. As I now lived and worked locally in a small town in the UK, the midwife who worked at my practice, was now also my personal midwife. I was pleased with this outcome and felt it would ensure I would be receiving a good service. I now realise that an individual hand-picked for victimisation in the UK state, does not receive anything at all, never mind a good service. The individual is dehumanised to such an extent that, in effect, they are stripped of all human rights.
Anyway, I opted for a home birth and asked for 'Gas and Air' to be provided as analgesia only. I did not want any other type of analgesia. The midwife visited my home on a couple of occasions and checked everything was ready for the home delivery. However, the day I went into labour, and the day my baby was later born, I telephoned the midwife on duty and asked for her to come to my house with the analgesia. My personal midwife had taken leave during the week my baby was expected in February. The midwife arrived and casually informed me she did not have any 'Gas and Air' available as it had all run out. I was in considerable pain and asked her to get some. Every excuse was made not to get any analgesia- she said her colleague, the partner midwife who also supposed to be on duty, was not available as she, "had been up late the night before". I told the midwife that we would have to drive to the nearest hospital, even though this was 35 minutes drive away and at this point the midwife took out her mobile telephone and said she would make enquiries. Time was going and being a doctor, I had not called the midwife till very late during the labour. The midwife was offering me opiates (strong painkillers) but I did not want to take this and had already decided this during the birth planning. At one point this midwife even left the house telling me she was going to go and find some 'Gas and Air'. By the time the midwife's colleague turned up to the house, it was too late as I was already in the second stage of labour (pushing).
As I was new to the local area, having moved to take up the position at the local health centre, it was only later that i found out the county ambulance service was 3 minutes drive away and that they would have kept canisters of 'Gas and Air' in their ambulance. The midwife would certainly have known this as her medical practice was situated next door to the ambulance station. Instead, she denied me the painkiller I wanted and then kept me around waiting whilst my labour pains worsened, so that I would not leave for the hospital.
I informed the my own General Practitioner as well as my colleagues, also GPs, of what had happened after the baby was born, but they did not take the situation further, and in fact advised me against making a formal complaint.
Human Right: to be able to access medical/health services, yes, but the service provided has to be appropriate and effective.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last updated: 3rd June 2012
Who are the real masked child abusers, continued...
Statistics show that children in care are more likely to have been abused whilst in care. These children are more likely to go to be less educated, unemployed when older, and more likely to become entrenched in the State prison system. If the State was judged in the same manner it judges certain individuals and the care of their children, the authorities should have acted and taken these children far away from the care of the State.
I have spoken a little about my personal experiences of institutions in the UK and generally how authorities illicit emotional responses in individuals, particularly those targeted, in order to threaten and control. More specifically, the authorities misuse their power to threaten parents about their children, even when no abuse has taken place. This emotional response, that any parent will have for their children, is a form of psychological torture, that can be used to coerce individuals in to subservience. This treatment is what I, and probably many other parents, have had to endure in the UK: The constant threat of one's children being taken into care.
I am yet to know what type of abuse I am meant to have exerted on my children or my children patients. Instead, if I complain that the authorities are acting wrongly, I am being told I do not co-operate. Why would anyone agree to their family being dismantled when there was no reason for this to occur?
This was just another way to harass and victimise a person and their family into subservience and nothing to do with co-operating with an authority and nothing to do with their children not being cared for sufficiently.
The institutions do not deserve respect if they cannot respect the individual in society and their human rights and continue to treat people unfairly and with discrimination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last updated: 1st June 2012
Who are the real masked child abusers?
I have spoken a little previously of how the British system has gone to the extent of trying to label me as a child abuser of my own children. In order to prevent me from practising as a GP, Northamptonshire Police, as described in excerpts from my up coming FREE online book below, (An Institutional Assault: The Secret Shame of the British System), the local Police made false accusations to the social services department. Of how employees at the local NHS trust set about getting information from my children's school teachers. In doing this, I have accused the ones making the allegations of abusing the Children's Act set by parliament to, essentially, deter paedophiles from working in nurseries. I will speak more about my personal experiences of this in the UK in my next update.
I have beliefs about who the real child abusers are, how they accuse others of the acts they commit and how they use child sex grooming techniques to control others from voicing bullying and psychological abuse.
I have also stated my belief that individuals in the British media, in collusion with the individuals in the xxxx and government, are not just involved in writing news stories about kidnapped and murdered little girls, but that they are actively involved in the crimes themselves.
Last updated: 31st May 2012 .
The rights to legal representation is a human right as enshrined in the EHCR, the European Human Rights Commission.
Every consultant doctor and General Practitioner in the UK and Australia, and probably in many other nations, have to be covered by insurance before practising. This is usually a hefty annual subscription (perhaps around £5000 on average) but in the event of a patient complaint/claim or any other employment/employer issues, allows access to a lawyer with specific training in medical negligence and matters that affect doctors.
In my case, since becoming a General Practitioner in 2005, I had been paying such a subscription to one of the two main medical doctor insurance companies available in the UK, the Medical Defence Union (MDU). this company is based in London. In my case I was abale to arrange for my employer at Brackley Health Centre in Northamptonshire England (see below), to pay the subscription, as part of my annual salary. This had been paid each September, seven times in total for my 6 years wokring at theat practice. When the matter with Northamptonshire Police arose and I sought advice from the MDU regarding deploying a lawyer, covered by the insurance, and that would have covered me for £10 million worth of fees/costs, I was informed that I could not seek such advice becauseI had not paid my subscription!
I knew this was not the case as my employer had regularly paid this each year, at my request. When I said this to the MDU, they said they had tried to telepehone me at my workplace, the medical practice, but that I had been on holiday. I asked the MDU why they did not write to me about the alleged missed subscription- they replied that they did not have my work address. This cannot have been true as on applying for the insurance each year, for the previous 6 years, my medical practice details had been given.
I believe this was a removal of legal representation by the State- as I have described below. I could nnot afford legal representation otherwise, especially since I was unable to work because of the GMC, General Medical Council's decisions to either stop or restrict me from practising as a doctor.
In that case I had to prepare a statement myself against the allegations that had been sent to the GMC, both by my previous employer (see below), in the form of a quasi-psychological report by doctors who were clearly not objective, the Primary Care Trust Public Health Directorate who had never met me and again were acting maliciously, and lastly Northamptonshire XXXX who I have accused of creating artificial circumstances (see below) as well as making false witness statements.
I sent a 'statement in defence', to the GMC. This was forwarded to the Primary Care Trust Public Health Directorate lawyer. This lawyer's response was to label me as being paranoid and this information was relayed to the GMC. The GMC went one step further and without meeting me or conducting an assessment, without my even seeing a doctor, I was told I had "Paranoid Personality Disorder", and that I should be assessed by the GMC psychiatrists. Any objection to this, I was warned by the GMC, could result in my being "struck off". Many doctors in a similar position refuse to see the GMC assessors and see their own independent psychiatrist.
I was already registered with the AMC (Australian Medical Council) and had even be offered positions in a medical practice. However, on completing the registration process in Oz, and before the GMC had made any decisions regarding my right to practise in the UK, the GMC refused to provide the registraion board in Oz with the necessary documentation that would have easily allowed me to start this employment.
PREVIOUS ASSAULT ON MY CAREER AND RIGHT TO EARN A LIVING
My initial career option after graduating from medical school was in Psychiatry. I began my training as a psychiatrist in London in 1994-7. Thereafter, I worked in temporary positions around the London area in psychiatric hospitals.
In order to become a consultant psychiatrist in the UK, as per other specialities, I was required to undertake examinations in the subject. Three years into my specialist training, I was informed by a consultant psychiatrist colleague, via a not too subtle "parallel story" about another doctor also training to be a psychiatrist that I later found to be completely false and merely a copy of my life story, that I would never pass my examinations to become a psychiatrist as long as I was married to a Nigerian. This consultant was a female Asian doctor who was in the position of supervising junior doctors and to give tutorials to those undergoing specialist psychiatric training. This was what I was told in a tutorial. I left this training programme shortly thereafter, and after I was told, by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, that I failed the examination, even though the marks I got indicated a pass.
AN INSTITUTIONAL ASSAULT: THE SECRET SHAME OF THE BRITISH SYSTEM
The following (above) are excerpts taken from my upcoming book. This book will be available for FREE on the INTERNET.
It describes mostly my experiences, but also those of my family that includes young children, in facing a hidden system in the UK, where victimisation is carried out in secret, in the dark, in order to cause harm and suffering to a few hand-picked individuals. There is an organised structure within this ‘system’, whereby such bullies are assigned roles in the black art of how to victimise the chosen individual, should they come across them. These people are placed in British institutions such as the Police, the Judiciary, the NHS, Prison’s service, the Council, Social security and even the media.
Some of these people are the “torturers”, and use methods, also known to some armed forces, such as the UK, to undertake these nefarious activities, including sleep deprivation. I will talk about the latter again, but first, allow me to describe my own personal experiences in my work as a doctor and a GP in a medical practice in the U.K.